LUL has been told by the Financial Reporting Review Panel that it did not accept some of its accounting practices and must change the way it records government grants.
Following an FRRP review of the 1998/99 accounts, LUL has had to move £4,896m from ‘capital employed’ to ‘deferred income’.
LUL had dealt with the grants using the same procedures as the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions, which has special accounting dispensations.
Wrapping LUL’s knuckles, the financial reporting watchdog said it did not have the same privileges.
A statement from LUL said: ‘This is a technical accounting change and has no impact on the financial substance of LUL.’
It goes on to say the grants were fully disclosed in the 1998/99 accounts which it says were supported by the DETR and KPMG, the external auditor, who declined to comment.
LUL said the change would not effect investment and had no effect on its assets.The FRRP ruling follows a complaint reported in Accountancy Age in March when Smith Williamson partner John Newman claimed LUL had overstated its assets. That complaint was rejected.
An FRRP statement said: ‘The directors now concur with the Panels and, in their March 2000 accounts recently published, reclassify all grants received as deferred income and accordingly take account of such amounts in determining net assets.’
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Company bosses are considering relocating operations or headquarters away from the UK following the country's decision to leave the European Union