RegulationAccounting StandardsMEPs call for greater transparency from IASB

MEPs call for greater transparency from IASB

The report also called for impact studies among interested parties before adopting new accounting standards - along with consultations of parliament on the IASB's work schedule

The European Parliament has called for the international standard setter to
improve its governance, saying it lacks in transparency and accountability as it
is not under the control of any democratically elected parliament or government.

Parliament adopted a
report
yesterday, drawn up by MEP Alexander Radwan, which detailed the deficiencies
International Accounting Standards Board.

According to the report, the IASB’s oversight body, the International
Accounting Standards Committee Foundation, has indicated that it will make
efforts to redress the lack in accountability, but Radwan insisted more needs to
be done.

MEPs believe that since the EU is the largest jurisdiction which has adopted
the IFRS, there should be more representatives of a European background in the
standard setting bodies, and that all trustees of the IASB should come from
nations that have signed up to the IFRS, or intend to do so.

Parliament wants to see a public oversight body set up involving all
IASCF/IASB public stakeholders, including legislators and supervisors, and a
body representing market participants, which would deliver an annual report on
the functioning of the IASCF/IASB. Such a body could also be responsible for
selecting and appointing trustees in a transparent manner with a geographically
balanced representation of all stakeholders.

The report also urges IASB to carry out impact studies among all interested
parties before adopting new accounting standards and want parliament to be
seriously consulted on the IASB work programme.

The report also criticised the IASB’s proposed version of the
IFRS for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) for
being far to complicated.

The report also called for the “fair value” principle to be limited in scope,
noting that it can be costly and lead to unrealistic valuations in some
circumstances.

Further reading:

Key IASB project is ‘not under-staffed’

Regulators call for end to self-appointed trustees

Related Articles

EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
The great professional services shake-up

Accounting Standards The great professional services shake-up

4w Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
What do clients actually want from an accountant?

Accounting Standards What do clients actually want from an accountant?

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

Accounting Standards IASB overhauls insurance accounting with issuance of IFRS 17

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Flag It Up! How accountants can protect themselves from money launderers

Accounting Standards Flag It Up! How accountants can protect themselves from money launderers

7m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

Accounting Standards Accountants shouldn’t neglect hybrid mismatch anti-avoidance rules

3m Alison Conley
Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

Accounting Standards Membership of the accountancy profession on the rise

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

Accounting Standards The real price of mates' rates in the provision of professional services

3m DAC Beachcroft