On Tuesday lawyers acting on behalf of 30 companies were given the go ahead in the High Court for a group litigation order (GLO) to pursue the Inland Revenue for hundreds of millions in overpaid corporation tax.
Sources close to the case say, if successful, which is thought ‘highly likely’, Tuesday’s case could cost the government around £750m.
An advanced corporation tax GLO from March 2002 involving 160 company groups, including Hoechst and Pirelli, saw the Revenue on the losing end of a High Court decision which could, when completed, cost the taxman between £300m and £500m. The two cases would bring potential Revenue losses to more than £1bn.
Experts expect the number of companies involved to increase.
Lawyers will claim the 30 companies should be allowed to offset losses made by European subsidiaries against UK-earned profits.
This week’s court action comes on the back of the Marks & Spencer cross-border loss relief case, which Accountancy Age revealed in November last year. The department store claims that it is due £30m in overpaid corporation tax, and that the Inland Revenue was in breach of Article 43 of the EC Treaty.
QCs for lawyers Dorsey & Whitney will take the GLO forward in the courts after being approached by PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Given that the Budget will see Gordon Brown struggling with a deficit in government finances of £10bn, the losses from successful court actions have the potential to significantly affect the chancellor’s plans.
A source close to the case said: ‘The court has recommended that a GLO be made to permit a group of about 30 companies to proceed in litigation against the Inland Revenue for the recovery of tax under the same circumstances as M&S.’
Revenue lawyers said in court the case could ‘cost hundreds of millions’.
Making Tax Digital will impose significant additional tax compliance costs on small businesses for little or no medium term benefit, tax and small business experts told MPs
MHA MacIntyre Hudson has partnered with cloud accounting software provider Xero ahead of the government’s requirement for digital records
The drive towards a fully digital tax regime is an admirable one, but mandation is simply wrong, according to one of the UK's most senior tax technology practitioners - Paul Aplin
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...