The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee said the decision to award the firm an extension to its NIRS2 contract – said to be worth between £70m and £144m – without launching a tender competition has put Accenture in a commanding position.
The extension – worth more than the original deal – was needed because the original deadlines were too tight for data transfer and legislative changes.The all-party group said that Accenture, formerly known as Andersen Consulting, appeared to be earning ‘excessive profits’ thanks to the deal.
The PAC said: ‘Accenture have outperformed their target productivity levels by a wide margin. On the basis of experience so far, the prices agreed appear to be very generous for a non-competitive contract, where, in practice, the Inland Revenue had little option but to use Accenture because of the high break costs of the original contract.
‘The Inland Revenue face a fresh challenge in 2004, when their contracts with Accenture and with EDS (their strategic supplier of other information technology systems) come up for renewal.’
The committee’s chairman – former Tory minister Edward Leigh – said: ‘The huge costs of getting out of the original deal effectively tied the Inland Revenue’s hands into having to give Accenture a large extra contract.’
Andrew Tyrie airs views on the Finance Bill, 'Making Tax Policy Better' report, and Brexit
In our latest managing partner Q&A looking towards 2017, CVR Global's Richard Toone talks about recruitment, and the potential threat of competition from the legal sector, as key issues for the firm in the coming year
Deloitte to avoid tendering for government contracts over the next six months, to appease Theresa May following consultant's report that painted a less-than-flattering picture of Brexit plans
In our first Q&A looking towards 2017, Menzies senior partner Julie Adams flags up increasing digitisation, aligned with more hands-on consultative services, as the key mix for her practice