Ernst & Young has denied that last week’s Court of Appeal decisioncision to call off merger. allowing BCCI liquidator Deloitte & Touche to pursue a $1.8bn (#1.1bn) claim against it, helped its merger plans collapse.
On Friday 13 February, the same day that E&Y announced it was calling off its KPMG merger, the court overruled a January 1997 order striking out Deloittes’ claim against Ernst & Whinney – now part of E&Y.
Deloittes’ original claim centred on whether E&Y, auditor to the bank’s Luxembourg-based parent company BCCI Holdings SA in 1985 and 1986, owed a duty of care to BCCI (Overseas), a subsidiary operating in the Cayman Islands. Overseas was audited by PW, which is being sued for $1.5bn relating to its 1985/1986 audits.
The January 1997 ruling separated the claims against E&Y and PW, but the appeal court judges accepted Deloittes’ arguments that the two companies operated as a single bank, and that their affairs could not be disentangled.
The opinion concluded the barrier between the two ‘was a mere shadow’ and ‘there had to be a constant interchange of information between the two sets of auditors’.
E&Y senior partner Nick Land stressed the reappearance of a possible $1.8bn liability had no effect on the merger: ‘There was no relationship. We made the KPMG decision before we knew the ruling.’
Andrew Tyrie airs views on the Finance Bill, 'Making Tax Policy Better' report, and Brexit
In our latest managing partner Q&A looking towards 2017, CVR Global's Richard Toone talks about recruitment, and the potential threat of competition from the legal sector, as key issues for the firm in the coming year
Deloitte to avoid tendering for government contracts over the next six months, to appease Theresa May following consultant's report that painted a less-than-flattering picture of Brexit plans
In our first Q&A looking towards 2017, Menzies senior partner Julie Adams flags up increasing digitisation, aligned with more hands-on consultative services, as the key mix for her practice