KPMG’s audit chief has penned a strident defence of his firm’s controversial
Rentokil service, arguing the arrangement was ethically sound and caters for the
“unprecedented challenges” faced by businesses today.
Oliver Tant, KPMG’s UK head of audit, has sought to correct “misleading”
comments about its much-discussed audit arrangement being used for FTSE 100 firm
Controversy has centred on the potential mix of internal and external audit
services the firm has offered, which has raised eyebrows across the audit
industry in recent weeks.
Audit guidelines warn of two dangers when an external auditor takes on
internal duties. The first concerns the potential for a company to audit its own
internal work, while the second concerns auditors making management decisions.
Tant sees no issue with the arrangement and said it enhances the audit
service. “This work does not replace, conflict with or undermine the
independence of the external audit it simply extends our understanding of the
business and its controls and hence the breadth and depth of insight we can
offer,” he said.
He believes the package responds to the “unprecedented challenges in this
It was Rentokil’s 31 July announcement that it would switch its external
from industry heavyweight PricewaterhouseCoopers that first sparked debate. In
its half-yearly result Rentokil said it could shave 30% off its audit costs with
KPMG’s package which, it said, “integrated financial assurance process,
extending external audit coverage to some work undertaken by internal audit”.
Tant said the arrangement did not merge internal and external audit
functions. “The service is not about merging the external and internal audit
functions. A company can continue to have its own internal audit function.”
What Tant does not address, however, is whether the arrangement can be used
overseas. An ongoing criticism is that it would be prohibited in the US and
could be challenged in France.
This issue prompted John Flaherty, Ernst & Young’s UK head of assurance,
to say he would steer clear of mirroring the arrangement.
“The way they have packaged and described it has brought them closer to the
line of what is acceptable and not acceptable… each of the firms needs to take
its own view about where that line is,” he said last month.
The second largest improvement in ‘significant’ levels of financial distress since the EU Referendum was in professional services, found research from Begbies Traynor
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned