Reports this week indicated that chancellor Gordon Brown was certain to
toughen the government’s stance on the late filing of self-assessment returns
and penalties. It is expected that HMRC will hike the penalty for late returns
from £100 to £250 and issue harsher penalties on those who unwittingly pay too
little tax when the pre-Budget report is delivered this Autumn.
Advisers, however, are already responding to what they see as a harsher
penalty regime by using unconventional defences.
Mike Warburton, tax partner at
said he was set to use the Human Rights Act to contest a penalty charged to one
of his clients.
Warburton said that after a ruling in the King vs Waldon case in
2001, a tax penalty under European law was found to be a criminal rather than a
The upshot is that any taxpayers who are issued penalties are entitled to the
same protections and protocols as a person facing a criminal charge, as per the
This means that when charging a penalty,
HMRC is obliged to
follow specific procedures and inform tax payers that they should be careful not
to incriminate themselves. This would provide taxpayers with more opportunities
to challenge penalties.
HMRC has won its tenth successive case against tax avoidance schemes promoted by NT Advisors. The Court of Appeal has ruled that NT ... read more
HMRC is continuing to ramp up the number of raids on premises it carries out as part of criminal investigations, searching 761 properties in the last year
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
Since the release of HMRC’s plans for digital tax reforms, many have agreed with the call for a delay