The research, by executive recruitment firm Russell Reynolds Associates, found the most common problem – cited by 46% of chairmen and CEOs – was an inadequate link between performance and pay.
Other findings included a perceived lack of influence of shareholder voting, compared with a belief in the power of remuneration committees.
Only 40% of chairmen and CEOs said the shareholder vote had a significant impact on company processes, and 20% said it had absolutely no effect whatsoever.
By contrast, 78% of respondents believed remuneration committees worked well, and were a vital weapon in rewarding, and therefore keeping, talented individuals.
Despite recent increases in pay for non executive directors, 79% of respondents said non-executive pay was too low, with many naming £50,000 as an appropriate figure within the FTSE100.
David Shellard, chairman of the Board Practice said: ‘The face-to-face discussions with chairmen, chairmen of remuneration committees and CEOs show that, in spite of extensive recent debate, the UK’s business leaders remain concerned about board pay.’
The second largest improvement in ‘significant’ levels of financial distress since the EU Referendum was in professional services, found research from Begbies Traynor
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.