TaxCorporate TaxGLOs: Lords rules on claim procedures

GLOs: Lords rules on claim procedures

Claims within time limits should go through special commissioners, while other claims should go through to the ECJ

Multinational companies challenging UK tax law on the basis of
inconsistencies with European law look set to be able to take cases to the ECJ
as soon as possible.

In a crucial legal judgment today, the House of Lords ruled that in one class
of ‘group relief’ claims – claiming relief against UK profits for losses
incurred by subsidiaries overseas – only those still within statutory time
limits should go through the Special Commissioners, the standard UK framework
for tax appeals.

Those who are outside the time limits, which are commonly two years, will
remain in the High Court. Lawyers were broadly pleased with the decision, and
hope to get the cases through to the ECJ as soon as possible.

Even those cases sent to the Special Commissioners could be referred to the
ECJ, should ‘practical convenience’ dictate, the judgment says.

Bill Dodwell, tax partner at Deloitte, said that the decision did mean,
however, that companies would have additional burdens in preparing claims: ‘if
people want to pursue claims they are going to have to do rather more work than
they had initially hoped for.’

The burdens come from presenting cases to the Special Commissioners in full,
assuming they are within time limits, rather than simply presenting the broad
outlines of a dispute in High Court proceedings.

‘For quite a lot of groups that will also mean making two sets of claims,’
said Dodwell.

That could deter marginal claims, meaning the Revenue may also be pleased
with the decision.

The High Court had initially ruled that all cases in the group relief
category should be heard through the Special Commissioners, which was overturned
in the Court of Appeal. The Lords judgment is said to have negotiated a ‘middle
way’ between those two decisions.

The case concerns some well-known names, including Heinz, BT and French bank
BNP Paribas, representing hundreds of other companies claiming for similar
issues.

Related Articles

‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

1m Emma Rawson
R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

Corporate Tax R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

2m Sam Swansborough
Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Corporate Tax Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Guide to the UK corporate tax system

Corporate Tax Guide to the UK corporate tax system

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor