PracticeConsultingICAEW council revokes support for IPR

ICAEW council revokes support for IPR

Following a protracted and heated debate, the ICAEW's council this morning voted overwhelming to withdraw its support for the Independent Professional Review.

But an attempt by a small practitioners’ spokesman, to introduce a further amendment to the Institute’s Company Law Review submission on shortening accounts filing for small business, was narrowly defeated.

The Institute will now support the move to shorten company filing times to seven months when its working party submits its report.

The IPR was slammed as ‘conceptually flawed’ and ‘confusing to the British public’ by council member Stella Fearnley and seconded by Baroness Noakes.

Fearnley said: ‘I want to propose that the council withdraw all support for the IPR today. It doesn’t offer any assurance. I think this is really scary.’

The IPR was first mooted by the Company Law Review panel as a light weight assurance for those companies now excluded from the annual statutory audit.

Exemption to the annual statutory audit was granted last year for companies with a turnover of or less than Pounds 1m. The exemption threshold is expected to be raised once again this year to Pounds 4.8m – the European limit.

Baroness Noakes said: ‘I stand fully behind Stella and her comments. I was particularly surprised to see it was the APB doing the field tests. This already brings confusion. This will damage us as an Institute.’

Criticism of the composition of the Institute’s working party and a lack of consultation on matters relating to the Company Law Review was plentiful.

John Malthouse, chairman of the Institute’s practitioner panel, said: ‘I’m very disappointed to see that the composition of the task force is [made up of] very large organisations and only two out of nine are from small companies. Big firms are not qualified to respond on small companies’ filing deadlines.

But, Andy Simmonds, council member and technical partner at Deloitte & Touche, countered opposition to shortening filing deadlines.

‘There is a degree of incredulity that it takes 10 months to do this with the technology now available,’ said Simmonds.

Links

APB to test new ‘lighter touch’ audit

English ICA demands more IPR research

Audit and its ressurection

Accountants set to lose £445m from audit change

Raising audit limit could harm small business

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

9m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

10m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

11m Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

10m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

10m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

10m Kevin Reed, Writer