PracticeAccounting FirmsAdviser: Privilege information

Adviser: Privilege information

The government's aim to reassess its implementation of the EU money laundering directive offers a glimmer of hope to practitioners.

Link: For small practice advice

For practising accountants, their role in the fight against money laundering continues to attract the keen interest of law-makers.

The requirements of the second EU directive on money laundering, which was implemented here by regulations taking effect on 1 March, will shortly be added to by the adoption of a third directive. Among other things, this is likely to lead to a new registration and licensing system for company formation agents and others who provide business addresses for third parties.

Currently, though, attention is being cast back to the second directive, and the issue of whether accountants have been treated unfairly in the UK’s implementation.

Under the second directive, member states are required to take necessary steps to ensure that those covered by the legislation pass on suspicions of money laundering to the national authorities information.

But member states have the option of exempting from this requirement ‘notaries, legal professionals, auditors, external accountants and tax advisers’ in respect of information acquired in the course of ascertaining a client’s legal position or defending or representing the client.

The UK government interpreted this option selectively. Instead of applying the exemption to all five listed categories, it afforded exemption from the requirement to pass on information to a money laundering reporting officer only to ‘professional legal advisers’, and only in privileged circumstances. Accordingly, the exemption from reporting was not extended to accountants and auditors.

What is now being formally re-examined by the government is whether the way that the UK has enacted the directive in fact breaches it. As well as considering whether all the listed categories should have been covered in any exemption from reporting, the question of inequality of treatment arises. The directive states those services that may be provided to clients by accountants and auditors, as well as legal professionals, should be treated in the same way by the law.

The question of whether accountants and auditors are capable of acquiring information in privileged circumstances is complex, and the accountancy profession has sought legal advice on the issue.

But the government seems now prepared to admit that the UK regulations have been drafted wrongly and that suitable amendment should be made in the near future.

The re-exploration of this issue has coincided with the consideration by the House of Lords of the scope of legal professional privilege. The Court of Appeal had decided in March that communications between the Bank of England and its solicitors were admissible as evidence in the case brought against the Bank by the liquidators of BCCI.

This would have thrown the whole notion of legal professional privilege into turmoil – but the Law Lords reversed the decision, which means that the scope to assert privilege over client communications is protected.

  • Send in your questions for our adviser panel of experts on matters relating to small practices by emailing adviser@accountancyage.com.
  • John Davies is head of business law at ACCA

Related Articles

Specialist VAT service provider joins MHA

Accounting Firms Specialist VAT service provider joins MHA

2h Austin Clark, Reporter
Grant Thornton expands financial services regulatory team

Accounting Firms Grant Thornton expands financial services regulatory team

1w Austin Clark, Reporter
FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
BDO strengthens Bristol team with new audit partner

Accounting Firms BDO strengthens Bristol team with new audit partner

2w Austin Clark, Reporter
Grant Thornton appoints new partner

Accounting Firms Grant Thornton appoints new partner

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Firms fall short on diversity

Accounting Firms Top 50+50: Firms fall short on diversity

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Top 50+50: Big Four hold steady, shake-up outside Top 20

Accounting Firms Top 50+50: Big Four hold steady, shake-up outside Top 20

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Revenue rises spark rankings shake-up

Accounting Firms Top 50+50: Revenue rises spark rankings shake-up

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor