The government has flatly refused to scrap the codification of directors’
duties in the company law reform bill, despite fears that it could lead to
Attorney general Lord Goldsmith proposed changes to the original bill to
enhance the power of the courts to throw out cases where there was no prima
facie evidence of a breach of duty in support of ‘derivative claims’.
The bill contains a list of issues that directors seeking to fulfil their
duty to promote the success of their company ‘must (so far as reasonably
practicable) have regard’.
Goldsmith insisted: ‘There is nothing new in this. What is the problem? There
are not six duties. There is one duty, which includes having regard to factors
to which companies already give regard.’
He denied directors would have to maintain expensive audit trails
to show they had considered all the issues.
‘We have tried to steer a constructive course between those who want more
onerous duties to be placed on directors and those who wish there to be no
duties at all,’ he added.
Tory peer Lord Freeman demanded the government drop the list and limit the
bill to state ‘only that a company director must act in good faith in what he
considers to be the interests of the company’.
"The whole idea of HMRC officials supplying confidential information about individuals to the media on a non-attributable basis is, or should be, a matter of serious concern," say Supreme Court judges
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy
A senior MP has questioned the impact of HMRC’s decision to undertake yet another radical overhaul of its internal structure
The Apple Tax situation; Accountants replaced by robots; and The Accountancy Age Top 50+50; all discussed by head of editorial Kevin Reed