PracticeAccounting FirmsTraders reassured over Customs’ VAT powers

Traders reassured over Customs' VAT powers

The Treasury has acted to ensure that businesses operating in a supply chain are given fair protection from new VAT seizure powers granted to Customs & Excise.

Link: Companies forced to police VAT scams

Economic secretary John Healey laid down a series of safeguard measures surrounding the new draconian powers which give Customs the right to seize VAT from other businesses in a supply chain, where missing trader fraud is uncovered.

He said formal warnings would have to be issued before Customs could demand security deposits from other businesses in the chain and promised businesses, which comply with ‘robust guidelines’ for checking the integrity of customers, suppliers or supplies will not be forced to pay the missing VAT.

Healey gave the undertakings during heated debates on new clauses spelling out the powers which have come under sustained attack from the ICAEW other professional bodies.

And he claimed provision for appeals means the new powers comply with the European Convention on Human Rights.

Speaking in the Commons Finance Bill Committee debating details of the Budget proposals, Healey said the powers were essential to deal with missing trader fraud costing the Treasury a ‘massive’ £1.7bn to £2.7bn a year.

He said one case alone involved £160m of ‘stolen’ VAT and said that in another, involving £30m and a network of companies in Spain, the Irish Republic and the UK, one of those convicted was sentenced to nine years in prison (the longest sentence ever for VAT fraud). A solicitor received five years in jail for laundering £8m of the proceeds.

Healey said the scam involved buying in a large consignment of high-value, low volume goods, such a mobile phones, VAT-free from another EU member state, and selling them on at a VAT-inclusive price and disappearing without paying the VAT.

He agreed the powers sought were significant but claimed: ‘We are dealing with serious fraud organised on an almost unprecedented scale.’

Healey pledged that the new power to demand a deposit ‘will be invoked only when a warning has been given’.

Despite opposition from the Tories and Liberal Democrats, the clauses were pushed through with the government’s built-in majority of 10.

Related Articles

FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

Accounting Firms FRC closes KPMG HBOS audit investigation, Treasury Committee expects ‘full explanation’

1d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PwC publishes 12.8% BAME pay gap

Accounting Firms PwC publishes 12.8% BAME pay gap

2d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
RSM recruits 288 trainees

Accounting Firms RSM recruits 288 trainees

5d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PwC to audit BBC pay policies following gender pay gap outrage

Accounting Firms PwC to audit BBC pay policies following gender pay gap outrage

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Partner moves from EY to Smith & Williamson

Accounting Firms Partner moves from EY to Smith & Williamson

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Deloitte global revenues hit record $38.8bn

Accounting Firms Deloitte global revenues hit record $38.8bn

6d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
KPMG’s apprenticeship intake jumps to 181 in 2017

Accounting Firms KPMG’s apprenticeship intake jumps to 181 in 2017

1w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
284 new trainees join BDO

Accounting Firms 284 new trainees join BDO

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter