Icann changes put domain names at risk

Icann changes put domain names at risk

IT managers with any of the 14 generic top level domains, such as .com, .org and .biz, in their portfolio risk losing them if they do not keep their registrar informed of their current contact details.

Link: Playing the domain name game

Under new proposals from The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which is responsible for worldwide domain name policy, every domain owner will be obliged to update their full contact details in ICann’s publicly available WHOIS database annually.

The proposal was passed by Icann’s board on 27 March and is expected to come into force by the end of May.

Icann wants to increase the accuracy of its records by forcing owners to keep their details updated, which would help it resolve possible disputes.

Although domain owners currently have to supply full details to the WHOIS database, many do not and the policy has not been widely enforced leading to occasional confusion about domain ownership.

‘[The change] is potentially quite serious,’ said Tim Brown, technical adviser at internet consultancy Demys.

‘It’s always been the case that businesses could lose their domains in this way, but the new emphasis on the rules means that losing a domain this way is much more of a risk now.’

Under the new rules, domains with incomplete or incorrect records will be suspended for 15 days and then deleted if the records are still not amended.

‘It’s similar to the number-plate on a car. The DVLA has to have contact details for each driver so that if you’re involved in an accident they can contact you,’ said Brown.”In the same way, if a domain is involved in spamming or cyber-squatting, the owners need to be contactable.” Brown added that businesses often do not have coherent domain policies, and could be caught out by the change.”It’s surprisingly common that a web designer or somebody else may have registered a domain for a company. Quite a lot of companies’ domains are all over the place and they don’t know enough to keep them well managed.”Icann’s efforts could be affected by the reluctance of owners to place their details on a public database, which can be ‘harvested’ and used by spammers and bulk mailers. While Icann also banned the use of its data for commercial purposes as part of the rule changes, market watchers question whether it is prepared to enforce the ban through the courts.

Related Articles

Four things we learned from AAT Annual Conference

Making Tax Digital Four things we learned from AAT Annual Conference

5d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Making Tax Digital webinar: It’s time to prepare

Making Tax Digital Making Tax Digital webinar: It’s time to prepare

5d Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Technology is the future for accountants, but not without risk

Technology Technology is the future for accountants, but not without risk

6d Adam Harper, AAT
Making Tax Digital: a great and much-needed step towards digitsation

Making Tax Digital Making Tax Digital: a great and much-needed step towards digitsation

1w Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
Four tech updates from Accountex 2018

Technology Four tech updates from Accountex 2018

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Making Tax Digital delays – are other policies at risk?

Making Tax Digital Making Tax Digital delays – are other policies at risk?

3w Androulla Soteri, MHA MacIntyre Hudson
Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

Audit Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

4w Martin Herron, MHA MacIntyre Hudson
Cybersecurity webinar: how protected are you and your data?

Security Cybersecurity webinar: how protected are you and your data?

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor