TaxCorporate TaxIPs lament corporation tax

IPs lament corporation tax

Gordon Brown has undermined measures designed to help lenders retrieve more of their money when companies they have supported go bust, experts warned this week.

Link: For more corporation tax news

They said that the introduction of corporation tax on gains and profits made during an administration, such as from the sale of property, has negated the effects of stopping the taxman from taking his money first.

Insolvency practitioners said that changes in the 2003 Budget could damage the new insolvency regime’s lender-friendly credentials by drastically diminishing the effects of the abolition of ‘crown preference’.

Big Four firm KPMG led the attack last week. Mick Mcloughlin, UK head of corporate recovery at the firm, said: ‘In taking away the Crown’s preferential status and replacing it with this tax charge, it appears that administration has become a less attractive option for most stakeholders, including lenders and directors.’

Until last September, the government was able to collect various taxes from an insolvent company, leaving ordinary creditors to share what little was left. But it gave up its special position as part of a reform package designed to make administration the preferred rescue method – and give ordinary creditors a better deal.

Concern about the tax change has been slow to emerge because it was published separately from the legislation that overhauled the insolvency regime. Nick Hood, a partner with Begbies Traynor, said: ‘The tax changes brought in alongside the Enterprise Act were slipped out quietly on Budget day last year and haven’t been at the forefront of the insolvency profession’s concerns.’

The Inland Revenue denied the changes were having an adverse effect on insolvencies. But Roger Brown, of the British Bankers’ Association, said: ‘It’s a significant element to the equation that you would expect lenders to take account of in deciding whether to go for administration or an administrative receivership.’

In administrative receivership, which is being phased out under the Enterprise Act, the IP’s principal duty is to the appointer – usually a bank – whereas in administration, it is to all creditors.

Related Articles

‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

1m Emma Rawson
R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

Corporate Tax R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

2m Sam Swansborough
Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Corporate Tax Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Guide to the UK corporate tax system

Corporate Tax Guide to the UK corporate tax system

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor