The Scottish institute claimed the stability of the UK tax regime and certainty of its impact was important in making the UK economy attractive to foreign investment.
‘The tax rules relating to residence and domicile should be seen to be stable, not subject to arbitrary change, and above all not subject to the risk of any retrospective change,’ said Ian Dewar, convenor of the ICAS tax committee.
Chas Roy-Chowdhury, head of tax at ACCA, agreed saying the Treasury had not carried out sufficient research into the implications of changing the rules. ‘They say it will generate £1.5bn in tax. But what about 20 years down the line? We need to see far more transparency in the debate, rather than the one-sided discussion it currently is.’
A clampdown on residence and domicile tax rules could, observers say, drive foreign investment abroad, resulting in job losses and ultimately lower tax receipts for the Treasury.
Richard Le Tocq, head of Locate Guernsey, discusses the chancellor’s approach to high net worth individuals, and why relocation is increasingly attractive to HNWIs
The firm says that the U-turn 'does not alter the need for a fundamental review of the way we tax work' and that the current tax system is in need of reform
Legislation on the NICs changes to be brought forward in the autumn following publication of 'the full effects of the changes to Class 2 and Class 4' in the summer
Following chancellor Philip Hammond’s Spring Budget speech, we explore the key takeaways for businesses and individuals