TaxPersonal TaxSex and drugs tax jibe upsets business

Sex and drugs tax jibe upsets business

The proposal to bracket tax avoidance with tax evasion causes consternation.

Businesses rallied behind the CBI this week in a row with the Inlandrnation. Revenue over the definition of illegal tax activities.

The dispute centres on controversial remarks by Revenue chairman Nick Montagu in which he compared tax crime to drug trafficking, prostitution and protection rackets.

Nicholas Dee, chairman of the CBI’s taxation committee, accused Montagu of threatening to implement a tax clampdown on multinationals by bracketing tax avoidance measures with illegal tax evasion. ‘Globalisation is uncomfortable for multinationals and the Revenue,’ he said.

Earlier this week, Dee confirmed he had requested a meeting between tax experts and the Revenue to ‘clarify what is sensible tax conduct’. He said: ‘The Revenue may just have a problem of presentation and not policy. But we are concerned by the prospect of a more adversarial Revenue with new powers.’

A spokesman for the Revenue rejected Dee’s comments on tax evasion: ‘He knows perfectly well there is a difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion. The Revenue has no wish to take a vindictive approach towards taxing multinational companies,’ he said.

Business pressure groups endorsed the CBI’s position.

A spokesman for the British Retail Consortium said: ‘It’s completely irresponsible to compare drug trafficking to tax avoidance. Tax exists as a cost, and so it is legitimate for companies to minimise their tax burden.

‘We’re right behind the CBI on this one. Business retailers increasingly believe the Revenue is sometimes in it for the money, not the equity.

The issue of tax evasion is political dynamite,’ he continued.

Individual finance directors are unlikely to speak out against the Revenue over fears of being ‘shot down’ for tax evasion.

Ernst & Young tax partner Patrick Stevens said: ‘If the Revenue tries to blur the distinction between tax avoidance and tax evasion the accountancy profession will shout long and hard.’

Richard Baron, deputy head of policy at the Institute of Directors, said: ‘It would be better if the government introduced new tax avoidance provisions rather than getting tough with the taxpayer.’

Related Articles

HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

5m Emma Smith, Managing Editor