There has been outrage over Customs’ publication of plans to ‘protect’ revenue from VAT groups, which has been followed by letters to large corporates with subsidiaries in additional fields demanding further information.
Accountants have warned the decision could cost outsourcing companies £250m a year in lost business from the finance sector.
When a business outsources back-office functions, it usually creates a VAT cost, which can make the entire deal uneconomic. Some companies, with the help of their accountant, structure their affairs to take advantage of the VAT grouping relief which can eliminate all or most of the VAT.
But a Customs spokesman said companies would be thrown out of VAT groups if they were found to be contrived for tax avoidance. He said: ‘We are not happy with large businesses exploiting VAT.’
He denied outsourcing would become less attractive, adding: ‘If a company has been involved in outsourcing to avoid tax, tough. If the decision was business-based there will be no problems.’
But John Kennedy, VAT partner at Deloitte & Touche, said: ‘The decision is going to wipe out the benefit of many outsourcing contracts and have a major effect on outsourcing.’
The Royal Bank of Scotland said it was waiting to see what action Customs took, but pointed out VAT grouping cut the tax agency’s administration costs.
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy