The government introduced legislation last week to ensure that when the upper
limit – above which high earners do not pay national insurance contributions –
goes up, they will not get equivalent pension benefits for the extra NICs they
pay. NICs have always theoretically been treated as not being a tax and as an
‘insurance scheme’ that qualifies payers for welfare benefits.
‘Doesn’t this show yet again that it’s a tax?’ said John Whiting of
The upper limit is being raised to be aligned with income tax. That means
taxpayers pay the 11% rate on more of their income. But they would normally
qualify for a state second pension for paying more, which will now not happen as
a result of the legislation.
‘It points out how stupid it is that it is not a tax and that it to go
through a separate bill,’ added Whiting.
Drastically fewer offices for HMRC in the hope to reduce their running costs
Tayabali Tomlin and d&t directors launch £20 a month TaxGo service, aiming to be the 'biggest UK firm' by client numbers
Companies must report on their complex financial structures including offshore accounts and notify HMRC
An examination by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has revealed serious concerns relating to HMRC’s plans