Rocketing costs for the
2012 Olympics may have
to be met by all British taxpayers, a cross-party Commons panel has warned. In
an uncompromising report, the body panned
Brown for inflating the huge price tag associated with the Games after the
Treasury insisted on a 60% contingency fund.
Original estimates put the cost of the Games at £2.375bn but there has
been increased speculation that the event will cost more than three times as
much. In recent months an unexpected VAT bill of £250m has also hindered
efforts to combat rising costs.
The report said: ‘Just 18 months after winning the bid, it is clear that many
of the cost figures are serously outdated.’ Funding for the core Olympic costs
is currently split between the Lottery which contributes £1.5bn, £250m from the
Development Agency and £625m from Council Taxpayers in London.
Concerns have been raised that that the tax net may have to be widened onto a
national scale in order to meet costs. The committee warned: ‘If the financial
pain of paying more for the Olympics is to be widely shared, it will require a
contribution from the Treasury.’
A revised budget is due to be announced in February, but officials conceded
that this would not take final security costs into account.
"The whole idea of HMRC officials supplying confidential information about individuals to the media on a non-attributable basis is, or should be, a matter of serious concern," say Supreme Court judges
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy
A senior MP has questioned the impact of HMRC’s decision to undertake yet another radical overhaul of its internal structure
The Apple Tax situation; Accountants replaced by robots; and The Accountancy Age Top 50+50; all discussed by head of editorial Kevin Reed