The first case to appear before the new ICAEW public disciplinary proceedings
resulted in a guilty verdict last night.
Ehsan Malik, of Ehsan Malik & Co, was found guilty of failing to carry
out hot file reviews of his audit work.
Malik was fined £5,000 and will have to pay costs of £9,000, and the panel
recommended he be excluded from ICAEW membership for five years.
Hot file reviews involve other firms coming in to look over audits.
The case began with defendant Malik turning up late, and a row over documents
that the institute counsel wanted to submit on the day, with Malik successfully
heading off the attempt.
With proceedings dragging, the parties had to continue discussions over lunch
to move the process on.
Malik, defending himself, argued that he had not signed off the audits in
question, but that other firms had and that his signature had been faked.
The ICAEW investigating committee’s counsel asked Malik why he had not
informed the institute, or Companies House, of the faked signature issues, a
move that Malik said would have been a ‘waste of time’.
Malik told Accountancy Age that he was ‘relieved’ the process was
now over and that he had not yet decided whether to appeal.
HMRC breaches client confidentiality; and partner profits fall at EY. These stories and more discussed in Friday Afternoon Live
"The whole idea of HMRC officials supplying confidential information about individuals to the media on a non-attributable basis is, or should be, a matter of serious concern," say Supreme Court judges
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned