TaxPersonal TaxNon-doms: called into question

Non-doms: called into question

Prospects: They’re super-rich and over here, but are they under-taxed?

The row over private equity and tax is growing. But more than that, the tax
status of rich wealth-creators is coming under growing scrutiny. Fears of
inequality are fuelling criticisms of many parts of the tax system, including
one of its oldest chestnuts, non-domiciliaries.

What happened?

Sir Ronald Cohen, a co-founder at equity giant Apax, speaking as the Treasury
Select Committee investigated the private equity industry, said that he feared
‘a riot’ caused by an entrepreneurial economy that has created a gap between the
rich and the poor.

That, in turn, has led to questions being asked about his tax status, and
whether or not he is a ‘non-dom’, entitled to avoid tax on income earned abroad.
The private equity debate has dragged the whole gamut of tax issues and the
wealthy into the spotlight.

The Evening Standard subsequently revealed that only 65 out of 400 UK-based
individuals, capable of making £10m a year or more, were paying any income tax.

That, as some of the industry’s leading lights (pictured here) were grilled
by the committee, is building a political storm.

What’s going to happen?

On top of Gordon Brown facing a potential postal strike during his first week
in office, the last thing he’d want to deal with would be concerns over the tax
status of the ultra-rich. While, at the same time, big drivers of the UK
economy in recent years ­ PE firms ­ face a public flogging.

The Treasury has been looking into non-dom rules for years, and Brown has
never suggested this so-called tax loophole would be closed any time soon.

Tax campaigner Richard Murphy has his thoughts: ‘The UK’s domicile laws are
the subject of a Tax Justice Network campaign,’ he says.‘They’re unjust, help
make Britain a tax haven, have fuelled the ridiculous price of housing in the
South East in particular, are pricing ordinary people out of something as basic
as a place to live and are fuelling the asset stripping activities of the
private equity sector.’

The Lib Dems seem clear about what they would do in power. Liberal Democrat
Treasury spokesman Vince Cable said the party would close the non-dom loophole
if they had stayed in the UK for more than 17 years.

Will the issue will be top of Brown’s agenda as prime minister? On past form,
maybe not, but the calls for change are increasing.

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

1d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter