If the Big Four are pinning their hopes on a deal with government to limit liability on a proportionate basis, then they must be equally hoping that Gerald Russell can broker a deal to keep investors and regulators happy.
Russell is at the heart of moves to encourage auditors to make a few concessions on disclosure, which will in turn make investors happy enough to persuade the government to place a limit on auditors’ liability.
This is the way the land lays. The government is giving every indication that it will offer fresh protection to auditors, if the audit profession can get its act together and agree a few changes that investors like.
The medium for doing this is the Audit Quality Forum and the man heading the project is Russell. If he fails to find sufficient common ground with investors, then proportionate liability may be dead in the water.
It’s a big burden to shoulder. The work of the AQF is not directly linked to any government decision on liability, but ministers will want to see some progress on key issues.
And they’ll want to see that progress emerging when the AQF meets next Monday. Only then will auditors stand any chance of getting a limit in the current draft companies bill.
Russell is under pressure to broker deals on several key areas: allowing shareholders to question auditors, as happens in Australia; shareholders determining audit fees; the publication of auditors’ engagement and resignation letters; and auditors disclosing much more on their client relationships.
None of these issues will be easy to settle, but Russell has a history of interest in corporate governance. He is a partner at Ernst & Young and is about to become chairman of the ICAEW’s audit faculty.
But it is his involvement with the minutiae of independent directors that lends him a pedigree fit to grapple with the current set of auditor issues. A co-chairman of the Independent Director Initiative, a collaboration between E&Y and the IoD, Russell appears predisposed to beefing up governance measures, a fact that the investor representatives at the AQF will no doubt be relieved about.
That said, his years as an E&Y partner will ensure Russell is no pushover.
For Russell, the AQF could be the beginning of a long-running role. There are already several further meetings set up for later this year, but even when the current issues are concluded, the plan is for the forum to continue as a talking shop between accountants, regulators and investors.
If correctly steered by Russell, the AQF could become crucial in cementing a permanently close relationship between investors and auditors.
KEY ISSUES FOR THE AQF
Shareholders should be allowed to question auditors – but what are the cost implications?
How much can shareholders learn from the publication of engagement letters?
Shareholders would clearly like to see auditors’ resignation letters published. A working group has been set up to look at this and is expected to report soon
The concept of shareholders determining audit fees has been thrown out
Shareholders want more information on auditor relationships – the forum believes the operating and financial review is the way to achieve this.
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
Dr Richard Willis provides a several thousand-year history lesson of the profession, from origin to modern-day