In this context, may I make a suggestion that would apply to any circumstance where there was a major revision by the ONS to an earlier published figure.
In this case, the doubling of the second quarter 2003 GDP growth rate from an initial estimate of 0.3% to a revised 0.6% would surely count as a major revision. In these circumstances, it would be helpful to have an arithmetic reconciliation between, for example, the original 0.3% figure and the revised 0.6% figure.
In the private sector, where a finance director provides the board with a different final profit figure to their first estimate, they would be expected to provide an arithmetic reconciliation between the two. I submit that the ONS should be no different, notwithstanding the fact that I do appreciate national statistics are not based on double-entry bookkeeping.
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements