PracticeAccounting FirmsAdviser: where do we go from here?

Adviser: where do we go from here?

After Enron, UITF40 may seem perverse. But despite its contradictions and questionable relevance, firms still have to deal with it

All the accountants I have come across recently seem to have one topic on their mind – UITF40 and the advancement of the recognition of income in our own accounts as well as many of our clients.

Most of the discussion seems to revolve around how on earth we have ended up in this position. It does seem perverse that so recently we were criticising Enron for recognising income too early, and all of a sudden our own profession is telling us to do just that.

I have serious reservations about whether anyone to do with the wording of the interpretation of FRS5 has ever actually been involved in private client work, rather than the provision of a product such as an audit or the completion of a tax return. But ours is not to reason why.

There is already a wealth of advice from the various institutes about how we should treat the change of accounting policy.

Perhaps the most interesting question is around the tax treatment. Is the uplift treated as Sch. D (VI) income, and therefore not subject to national insurance contributions? Every little helps.

But it seems to me that the major problem that will affect us will be the funding of the tax on the uplift in the value of work in progress, or what will probably now be described as ‘incomplete contracts’, as a result of stating incomplete work at selling price rather than cost.

In January 2007, we are going to have to find a lot of cash for a higher tax bill. Any practice trading at the limit of what the bank will lend is going to be in severe difficulties – there are no extra assets to justify any higher borrowing levels. It’s the same business with the same assets; we’re just describing the assets differently.

I suspect the lawyers are looking forward to re-wording a few partnership deeds as well.

My experience is that practices have countless different ways of dealing with partner retirements, and many of these include annuities payable to the retiring partner, based on the value of ongoing work, or incomplete contracts.

Now that the accounts figure has been rebased, the legal jargon used in many deeds will be wrong. For example, in cases where the partnership capital is repayable over a shorter time span than the sale value of incomplete contracts, some practices will need to renegotiate those retirement terms.

The unfortunate sufferers in all of this will be the clients – if we’re paying our tax earlier, we’re going to be submitting many more fee notes, much more promptly and regularly.

Financially it’s sensible, but it will put a deal more pressure on the professional relationship.

At the very least there will be much more pressure on us to review our work in progress more carefully at the year end.

What a wonderful thought for those of us with a year end in December – an enjoyable exercise somewhere between Christmas and those last-minute tax returns?

Mark Spofforth is an ICAEW council member and partner at Spofforths

Related Articles

Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

Accounting Firms Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

Accounting Firms British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

Accounting Firms Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

1m Lewis Silkin
RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

Accounting Firms RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
RSM announces 11 partner promotions

Accounting Firms RSM announces 11 partner promotions

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

Accounting Firms BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

Accounting Firms What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

2m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
EY, Deloitte lead Big Four in gender pay gap reporting

Accounting Firms EY, Deloitte lead Big Four in gender pay gap reporting

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor