Expectations confounded as double-digit growth slips away

Expectations confounded as double-digit growth slips away

The great expectations many firms had of the last financial year have been dashed. We report on how the dreams of double-digit growth faded

The growth in fee income in the 2004 financial year that marked such a change
in the fortunes of the top consulting firms has continued through to the figures
for 2005, if not to the extent that many in the industry were expecting.

Link: Management Consultancy Top 75 index, click

Last year, Management Consultancy’s annual fee income study showed greatly
improved growth, following the stagnant 2003 financial year when there was
hardly any growth worth speaking of.

The indications back then were that the market would continue to pick up and
many firms reckoned that the 2005 financial year would witness full recovery,
with fee income growth rates well into double digits.

It did not happen. Total fee income for the top 75 consulting firms grew by
£455m for the 2005 financial year, or 9.6%. Not only is this a much lower rate
of growth than the previous year, it is also a case of a much lower fee income
increase. The 2003/04 gain was 13.9%, which included an extra £574m in total fee
income. It is a big disappointment, especially as many firms were projecting the
sort of growth that would generate a total fee income improvement in excess of

Others, though, were not so sure. When we did the study last year, some
larger firms were projecting more modest rates of growth. And what happens to
the very large firms affects the total market. Last year, 13 firms each had a
total fee income above £100m. This year, Detica joined the ranks of the £100m+
players, who together earned a total fee income of nearly £4bn, or 77.6% of the
total of all firms on our list.

In last year’s study, those same 14 firms accounted for a total fee income of
£3.6bn in the 2004 financial year, or just over 78% of the total of all firms.
Together, these firms had a total fee income improvement in this year’s study of
£327m, or 8.9% ­ a lot less than expected given that demand for consultancy
seemed to be improving.

The same trend appears in the figures of the 10 largest consulting firms,
which account for just over two-thirds of the total fee income of all firms on
our list.

These 10 firms had a combined fee income gain of £394m for 2004, or nearly
14% up on the previous financial year. For 2005, the figures are significantly
lower, with a gain of £256m, just less than 8%. Had the top 10 enjoyed a fee
income gain in 2005 equivalent to the previous financial year, the actual
combined gain would have been almost £200m more than it actually was.

The figures indicate that the growth rate has fallen. Something that came
across time and again when we spoke to firms this year was that not only has
consultancy become harder to sell, but the emphasis has also started to turn
towards non-advisory revenue streams. Implementation and outsourcing have become
much more important because they provide what some call annuity work ­ the firm
works for the client for very much longer. Outsourcing revenues also seem to be
growing faster than consultancy revenues.


It is always difficult to obtain fee income figures that relate solely to
consultancy, which we define as business advice. What we always try to avoid for
our survey is having a mismatch of figures that might include anything from tax
advice to software to computer hardware.

This is one reason why we use estimates in our tables. Not all the larger
firms have the sort of reporting mechanisms that enable them to arrive easily at
an exact figure for each of their different activities. Accenture, for example,
had a total revenue figure for 2005 of £1.4bn, but not all of that was
consultancy, and we estimate the firm earned £835m. The balance was made up from
other revenue streams.

We have also estimated income where final figures are not yet available.
Public companies, for example, might have a 2005 financial year end of 5 April
2006, but their figures might only be available towards the end of May or early

And in some cases, firms make no accounting distinction between consultancy
and implementation or outsourcing. Their projects might embrace all these
activities. Our challenge each year is to arrive at realistic consultancy fee
income figures that are consistent with previous years.

Something else that happens is that where an estimate was provided one year,
it might be revised the next, with the benefit of final accounting figures. For
example, a year ago we showed a total fee income figure of £4.9bn for the top 75
firms. This year, our revised figure for 2004 is £4.7bn for the top firms,
chiefly due to having a figure for Atos Origin last year but a rather more
modest figure for Atos Consulting this year.


This year’s new names are headed by Diagonal Consulting in 23rd position.
Diagonal was acquired by the Morse Group in 2004 and we have estimated pro rata
figures because of very different accounting periods before and after the

Chaucer Group comes in at 35 with fee income of £17m, and Dbi Consulting
comes in at 41 with £13.6m.

Another new name is Xantus Consulting, which recently won various industry
awards, including the BCS IT Consultant of the Year, and an MCA award for work
with Barclays, Prudential, Boots and National Australia Group. Xantus comes in
at 58 with fee income of £3.9m.

In 57th place is Aspiren with fee income of £4.0m. Aspiren had the highest
growth rate of all the top firms, the fastest growth of all small firms, and the
highest growth rate of all firms for each of the last two years.

Looking at growth, it is no surprise that Accenture again tops the list, with
an estimated fee income gain of £82m, or nearly 11%, as Table 2 shows. IBM
Business Consulting Services comes second with an estimated £50m gain, up nearly
9%. In third place is Deloitte with an estimated gain of £36m, or 11.4% up.

Both Detica and LogicaCMG had fee income growth of £31m, with Detica
recording a meteoric rise in the second half of the financial year.

Our estimated fee income for Xansa, the third largest firm, shows a lower
figure for 2005 than 2004. The estimate is based on half-year results and the
lower figure is because the company is increasingly using an integrated offshore
delivery capability, which has a revenue deflationary effect.

Typically, the largest firms have the highest fee income growth figures in
cash terms in a booming market. This year, though, some of the medium-sized
firms rank alongside them for revenue gain. The estimated figures for Hedra and
Methods Consulting show gains little different from firms several times their
size. Hedra’s estimated fee income was up 31% and Methods Consulting provided an
actual figure up by just over 26%.


Smaller firms, starting from a smaller base, invariably show the largest
percentage fee income gains. It is difficult and very rare for one of the top 10
players to add an extra 30% or 40% in a single year.

Table 3 shows the firms with the highest percentage fee income growth rate in
the 2005 financial year. Aspiren, E-A and Xantus top the list. Mantix, a
slightly larger small firm, is in fourth place, followed by Berkshire and

Acquired by Enterprise in April last year, Strategem still operates as an
autonomous company. It pointed out to us this time that while its fee income is
normally shown in our public sector and local government tables, much of its
work is on government-funded business support projects for SMEs, a market
category we do not specifically identify in the annual study. Strategem’s fee
income figures show it made a 57% gain last year.

In all, 18 firms had fee income growth of 25% or more, and five had growth of
over 50%. The Consultancy Company was the smallest of the 18. Just over a year
ago it sold off part of its business, so its 2004 figure was down on the
previous year.

Hedra and Methods Consulting both feature in Table 3 and at the top of Table
4, which shows the changing fortunes of the medium-sized firms. We define medium
as all those firms with total fee income of more than £25m in the last financial
year, but less than £100m. There are 14 medium-sized firms in our top firms list
this year with a combined fee income of £759m. This is £67.7m above the figure
for the same firms in the previous financial year, a change of 9.8%.

While this sort of growth is not to be sniffed at, it is lower than expected.
On average, these firms put on an extra £4.8m in fee income each; only two,
Methods and Hedra, had fee income growth in double figures.

It is often said that competition on all sides makes growth difficult for
medium-sized firms. They face competition from much larger firms with larger
resources and increasing competition from slightly smaller firms.

Management Consultancy defines small/medium-size firms as having fee income
above £10m but less than £25m. There are 16 on our list this year with combined
fee income of £258m ­ £36m more than the previous financial year, a growth rate
of 16.4%. In the last financial year, these 16 firms added £71m in fee income,
an improvement of over 11%.

Small firms ­those with fee income of less than £10m­ did well. Table 6 lists
the fastest-growing small firms, ranked by percentage growth rate. The 20 small
firms listed had fee income growth of 12.5% or more. Of all the small firms,
Mantix had the highest gain: £3.4m, or nearly 62%.

Considering the relatively low overall fee income growth rate of the top
firms, the burning question is whether the industry is in for a period of slow
rather than rapid growth.

It does seem unlikely that there will be a return to the days of 20% annual
overall growth, and with low economic and GDP forecasts it is possible that
future growth may be on a more modest scale.

Consultancy may also now constitute a mature market, so future growth will
have to come from other non-advisory services provided by the consulting firms.

But consultancy is by no means dead. A glance at the list of firms with
above-average growth for both of the past two financial years shows that 25
firms, some large but many in the medium to small band, have consistently grown
at rates far above the industry norm. The only seed of doubt here is that 13 of
these firms had a lower growth rate in the last financial year than in the
previous one, although optimists will be quick to point out that 12 of the 25
had a higher growth rate than in the previous year.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

12m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

2y Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

2y Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

2y Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

2y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

2y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

2y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

2y Stephanie Wix, Writer