PracticeAuditSharman’s concerned about going concern

Sharman's concerned about going concern

International standard setter should Sharman's call on going concern

Sharman’s concerned about going concern

LORD SHARMAN‘s conclusions on going concern are to be applauded. The system we have has long since been problematic and not nearly nuanced enough.

In a report this week Going Concern and Liquidity Risks he concludes that the current system is too “binary” – a company is a going concern or it isn’t.

That doesn’t nearly cover all the possibilities. After all, a business may be deemed a going concern for the purposes of reporting, but may indeed face serious difficulties that stakeholders should know about. Hence the need for more information and in different forms.

A more nuanced approach should also mean that disclosures can be made without becoming the killer blow that causes a company to collapse. This is why the all or nothing approach of the current going concern regime is inadequate. The International Accounting Standards Board has to listen because accountants and company directors really do need a better system.

Related Articles

Audit Commission minister leaves observers in awe

Audit Audit Commission minister leaves observers in awe

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer
Blog: Auditors face big change

Audit Blog: Auditors face big change

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer
OFT is on the audit case - hopefully.

Audit OFT is on the audit case - hopefully.

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer
Restrictive clauses and the Loch Ness Monster

Audit Restrictive clauses and the Loch Ness Monster

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer
The loneliness of long distance audit reform

Audit The loneliness of long distance audit reform

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer
Why concern about 'going concern?'

Audit Why concern about 'going concern?'

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer
Cable and the audit challenge

Audit Cable and the audit challenge

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer
Brussels talks audit reform

Audit Brussels talks audit reform

7y Gavin Hinks, Writer