TaxCorporate TaxProgTax blog illuminates Vodafone deal

ProgTax blog illuminates Vodafone deal

BIG TAX AVOIDANCE schemes have a new foe – the Progressive Tax Blog. Just launched, the blog took as it’s first subject HMRC’s settlement with Vodafone.

The blog illuminates the detail behind the Vodafone scheme, which it argues saved Vodafone around £1bn in tax. The detail is fascinating – but ProgTax blog makes it clear.

I won’t go into the detail – read the blog. But it’s worth pointing out that the blog achieves a number of things. First, in being clearheaded it sets proportion on the matter. Claims that Vodafone saved £6bn look hysterical in light of this. That said £1bn is a lot of money that the Exchequer could use right now.

The next thing the blog achieves is to reveal the bind that HMRC finds itself in. The department, and Dave Hartnett in particular, have received much criticism for the settlements strategy. But the blog illustrates that HMRC has little choice given the tangle it finds in between UK anti-avoidance measures and EU tax law. In short, HMRC cuts a deal because if it challenged the relevant EU law, and lost, it could set a precedent that would mean losing even more tax revenue. That taxman is therefore playing the percentages. ProgTax Blog, ironically, gives a clear view of the complexities and calculations being made to ensure that big companies pay something.

Lastly, the blog throws light on the sorry role of Luxembourg in the Vodafone saga. Without Luxembourg cutting advantageous deals, part of the problem goes away.

The settlements policy therefore should be a short-term strategy. The longer game is to force tax havens into reform and refine the way EU tax law works with national law.

While the tax havens are under pressure, I wonder if there are many politicians with the will and determination to tackle EU law. Without that it seems what should be a short-term measure will be here to stay. Protestors will have plenty to complain about for some time. But while the big companies are obvious targets, protestors would do better to switch their attention to the EU and the tax havens themselves. Like a drugs policy its worth deterring users, but getting at the suppliers is the real issue.

Related Articles

Watch out when winding up

Corporate Tax Watch out when winding up

1m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

Corporate Tax HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

8m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

8m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

8m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

10m Alia Shoaib, Reporter