Just when it seemed the battle for legal professional privilege was to be handed over to the accounting institutes, the Pru has applied to the Supreme Court for another round of “taxing” argument.
Good luck to them is all I can say.
Having lost in the High Court and Court of Appeal, where the ICAEW also made a representation on the Pru’s behalf, it seemed as if the insurer would call it quits.
It was then expected that the ICAEW would put together a battle plan, potentially involving the CIoT, as to how to take the argument forward. This was likely to involve government lobbying to push for a change in the law.
Where the Pru’s argument will go is unclear – maybe its QCs will push the “LPP is a fundamental human right” angle. If the Court decides to hear the case, of course.
And I’m sure the ICAEW will be preparing for the court NOT to hear the case, or that the Pru could well lose again if the hearing does happen.
Lobbying government still seems the most likely road to success. And another court hearing may end up as a sideshow that actually delays moving down that path.
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group
Six new partners have been revealed by top ten firm Mazars
KPMG has announced the appointment of David Campbell as partner within its Enterprise practice.
RSM has appointed Kevin Edwards as a tax partner in its Nottingham office