TaxCorporate TaxVodafone case: is it significant at all?

Vodafone case: is it significant at all?

As someone who has been writing about the Vodafone CFC case over the last two years like an overexcited puppy, I can hardly turn around now and say that the case isn’t significant at all. But in one sense, it arguably is.

Esteemed experts from accountancy firms and from law firms are all lining up to say that the High Court’s rejection of the CFC rules is terrible news for the government, and removes a key set of anti-avoidance principles.

But will it have any impact?

Few companies have big CFC liabilities like Vodafone, because the rules are an obstacle rather than anything else: companies plan around them. So there aren’t thought to be huge numbers of cases awaiting resolution.

And secondly, noone is going to say to themselves now: ‘Why don’t we ignore the government’s controlled foreign companies rules.’

Whatever happens, the government will introduce new rules that will have a similar effect, so I doubt anyone’s behaviour will ultimately change going forward. (it will actually prove more of a problem for taxpayers, since they’ll have to master the new rules rather than the old ones.)

What’s more, I suspect there is some doubt the judgment will stand. Taxpayers often win in the High Court, with HMRC having a better record elsewhere. With £2bn at stake, there’s no danger of anyone backing down if they don’t have to.

The really intriguing part of the case is not, if you ask me, what impact this has for other companies, but on what Vodafone was up to.

The company has declined to elaborate on the details of its Luxembourg subsidiary, which bought the shares of Mannesmann, and in which those shares attract no capital gains charge.

Are all relevant management decisions made in Luxembourg? Are there lots of people there? Vodafone says it meets the tests, but hasn’t pleaded its case in court in full.

Related Articles

HMRC hiring spree welcome but won't solve 'customer' service issues alone

Corporate Tax HMRC hiring spree welcome but won't solve 'customer' service issues alone

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Tory tax plans ease business’s worries, but personal tax path unclear

Corporate Tax Tory tax plans ease business’s worries, but personal tax path unclear

3y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Ridiculous timeframe given to read and debate the Finance Bill

Corporate Tax Ridiculous timeframe given to read and debate the Finance Bill

3y Calum Fuller, Reporter
HMRC must apply common sense to pay-up first plans

Corporate Tax HMRC must apply common sense to pay-up first plans

3y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Scrapping IR35 all very well – but what else?

Corporate Tax Scrapping IR35 all very well – but what else?

4y Calum Fuller, Reporter
Election concerns likely to colour the Budget

Corporate Tax Election concerns likely to colour the Budget

4y Calum Fuller, Reporter
LLPs guidance delay sign concerns may be heeded

Corporate Tax LLPs guidance delay sign concerns may be heeded

4y Calum Fuller, Reporter
ICAEW takes important educational step in tax debate

Corporate Tax ICAEW takes important educational step in tax debate

4y Calum Fuller, Reporter