PracticeAccounting FirmsAnalysis: Law Society’s beef with the ICAEW’s probate plans

Analysis: Law Society's beef with the ICAEW's probate plans

Accountancy Age runs through concerns about the ICAEW's plan to become a probate licensing body, as the institute looks to defend itself

IN A LETTER SEEN by Accountancy Age sent to the Legal Services Board chief executive Chris Kenny, Law Society chief executive Des Hudson (pictured) outlined concerns with the ICAEW’s application to become a licensing body for the grant of probate.

Its concerns, and reasons why it believes the institute should not be allowed to become a licensing body under its current application, are outlined here:

A key part of the Legal Services Act, which sets out to open up the provision of legal services, is that the representative and regulatory functions of a licensing body must be separate. The Law Society believes the ICAEW’s application fails to achieve this. The ICAEW’s plan for an ‘independent’ probate committee would still be answerable to its Professional Standards Board, itself answerable to Council. This structure does not create a lay majority. The arrangement proposed by the ICAEW “contrast starkly” with that of other legal regulators.

The Law Society believes the ICAEW’s arguments that they will only deal with a small number of licenses is “unconvincing” and is “inconsistent” with its other comments that the move would increase competition.

The Law Society accuses the institute of proposing arrangements that would “give rise to a regime that leads to differential, inconsistent and anti-competitive arrangements among probate practitioners”.

The society warns the Legal Service Board that allowing the institute through on its current proposals would make the board seem “so concerned to encourage new entrants to the market that it will ignore the philosophy behind the Act”.

The application significantly underestimates the range of work undertaken in non-contentious probate, believes the society. Complex situations involving lifetime gifts, pre-owned asset and guardianship are becoming more frequent.

With the ICAEW able form alternative business structures (ABSs), where accountants and lawyers can work together more freely, where probate can be offered by such firms.

If there is poor service, the society believes it would be more difficult for the public to gauge where to complain if there is poor service.

The ICAEW’s riposte to the Law Society’s concerns can be found here

Related Articles

IPA issues first specialist insolvency licence

Accounting Firms IPA issues first specialist insolvency licence

1y Chris Warmoll, Writer
AAYP 2016: The 35 under 35

Accounting Firms AAYP 2016: The 35 under 35

1y Richard Crump, Writer
MP queries possible conflict of interest over ex PwC partner watchdog role

Accounting Firms MP queries possible conflict of interest over ex PwC partner watchdog role

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer
Hellas liquidator to push EY for compensation over botched administration

Accounting Firms Hellas liquidator to push EY for compensation over botched administration

2y Richard Crump, Writer
Losing their moral compass: Should accountants uphold the public interest?

Accounting Firms Losing their moral compass: Should accountants uphold the public interest?

3y Jaimie Kaffash, Writer
Institutes call for reliefs and extensions to help flood victims

Accounting Firms Institutes call for reliefs and extensions to help flood victims

2y Calum Fuller, Reporter
ICAEW hits a century of ABS licences

Accounting Firms ICAEW hits a century of ABS licences

2y Chris Warmoll, Writer
How accountants can benefit from legal services revamp

Accounting Firms How accountants can benefit from legal services revamp

2y James Johnson