The general opinion now is that, as well as identifying efficiencies during
the second year under the new laws, the higher costs first time around were also
attributable to many mistakes made by companies trying to implement the new
rules. UK companies could do well to learn from this, according to Dawn
Cresswell, part of UHY Hacker Young’s Sarbox advisory team.
From 15 July, UK companies with a listing in the US will also have to face
the same tough rules on internal controls. But as Cresswell said: ‘UK companies
have the advantage of being able to see what mistakes have been made in the US
and making sure they don’t make the same ones.
‘US companies found they had misallocated a lot of their time and money in
trying to achieve the first year of Sarbox compliance. They have now learnt from
these mistakes and the dramatic reduction in costs in the second year reflects a
more considered approach.’
This view is backed by a recent report from consultants CRA International.
Using data from Big Four clients, it found that audit costs for section 404
compliance among a sample of Fortune 1000 companies had dropped 44% on the
previous year to an average of $4.8m (£2.7m).
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
Dr Richard Willis provides a several thousand-year history lesson of the profession, from origin to modern-day