Bill of right

Bill of right

We could soon see the back of the backhander if a bribery bill is passed into law

The bribery bill was one of the lucky fifteen to make it into the Queen’s
speech last week. It has been a long, hard road for this piece of legislation.

The government signed the OECD Convention, committing itself to provide
adequate and appropriate legal framework in this area, in 1997. Twelve years on,
we are still waiting; but probably not for much longer.

You may not know this, but the UK’s international reputation for enforcement
and prosecution of bribery is lamentable; even when measured against other
countries that are generally perceived to be more systemically corrupt.

But the new rules, which could be enacted before the next election, will put
many UK business leaders firmly on the hook for bribery and corruption within
their businesses and sales channels.

The killer punch hidden within this new bill is that companies will soon be
criminally liable for a failure to prevent bribery. This is new, and it means
that ignorance is no longer a defence, if it ever was.

Alongside this, there is the introduction of a specific offence of bribing
foreign public officials. The combination of these elements is a cause for
serious reflection and review of current policies and practises in UK companies.

If this sounds scary, the bribery bill proposes a defence where the company
can show that it has implemented “adequate procedures” to prevent bribery.

This is where it gets interesting. The legislation will not be retrospective,
but neither will any scramble to throw a few internal policies together to avoid
liability or achieve mitigation.

“Adequate procedures” implies a continuum of culture, behaviour and properly
embedded controls; in other words, a sustained (and sustainable) process, not a
one-off event.

The fact is that, if you are running a major organisation across multiple
territories and markets, your business is highly exposed to the risk and you
could well be paying bribes somewhere in the world without knowing about it.

And if your controls and procedures aren’t up to scratch, it could take at
least twelve to eighteen months to build them up, in which case you can forget
about the adequate procedures defence unless you act now.

Company directors and other senior executives need to face up to this issue
as never before and figure out where their companies might be at risk and where
they, as legally responsible individuals, can take comfort that they are not in
breach of the law.
Will Kenyon is a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource