Big Four gains support on liability argument

Big Four gains support on liability argument

A report was released by the European Commission last week arguing for capped liability

Fed up with the difficulty of trying to get the UK to pass limited liability
in anything but a watered down form, the Big Four appear to have won the
argument on another level.

A report was released by the European Commission last week arguing for capped
liability.

Citing disturbing statistics – 11 EU firms face at least 11 claims ranging
from $220m (£117m) to $1bn and five claims worth over $1bn – the study
recommended adding that ‘a limitation on auditor liability would reduce risk
caused by potential catastrophic claims’.

The consultancy that produced the research, London Economics, also discarded
the argument that caps on liability might encourage complacency, and instead
stated that a cap would result in reduced market concentration.

The study highlighted the fact that auditor liability insurance available for
higher limits has fallen sharply in recent years.

The remaining source of funds to face claims may essentially be the income of
partners belonging to the same international network.

The Big Four have long sought protection from vast and damaging claims to be
factored into company law.

Losing another big firm like Arthur Anderson, which collapsed in 2002, would
not only affect firms and the profession, but also pose serious risks to
financial stability, given the reliance of large banks, insurers and
trans-national companies on their services.

The EU moves will infuriate investors, however, who believe that limited
liability moves will water down the audit.

Peter Wyman of PwC, perhaps predictably, has commended the report. ‘They [the
researchers] understood the market, as well as the insurance market and the
economic consequences of liability reform.’

Nicholas Heaton, a partner at Lovells, the law firm, cautioned that the move
would not completely protect auditors. ‘Reputational damage will come with
failure, and reputational damage cannot be protected in the same way liability
exposure can be protected,’ warned Heaton.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource