Companies flying blind over execs and workforce pay link

Companies flying blind over execs and workforce pay link

Moves to make pay hikes in the boardrooms of the UK’s largest companies take rank called into question again as the deadline for the rule change draws closer

Mary Carter, partner at KPMG

Head-scratching: Mary Carter

Moves to make pay hikes in the boardrooms of the UK’s largest companies take
rank and file salary conditions into account have been called into question
again as the deadline for the rule change draws closer.

The demands are part of requirements for the Companies Act, which comes into
force next year. However, corporate governance experts at KPMG said that
remuneration committees would be flying blind on the issue.

‘It’s going to cause a certain amount of head scratching,’ said Mary Carter,
KPMG partner in the firm’s executive compensation division. ‘I was quite
surprised it went into the regulations. It will be an interesting period.’

Executive remuneration is one of the most heavily-scrutinised sections of the
annual report, but companies being forced to make a link between workforce pay
scales and those in the boardroom has caused concern.

Commentators have said that there are so many different app-roaches that it
would be almost impossible to regulate.

‘Companies would have to produce huge tables, which would have to be put into
a company report, and probably have no relevance to the people reading it,’ said
Patricia Peter, the Institute of Directors head of corporate governance, when
the idea was first suggested by the DTI last year.

‘Also, there’s very little actual connection between someone working on a
checkout and the pay of a chief executive.’

The lack of clarity relating to executive pay formulas, especially at the top
end of the capital markets, has been red flagged by PricewaterhouseCoopers,
CIMA, and corporate reporting consultants Radley Yeldar.

The arrangements, which include highly intricate share, pension and incentive
schemes, were high on the conference agenda.

‘There’s lots more “fudge” around bonuses in the in the bigger FTSE
companies,’ said Carter. ‘The incentives in AIM and small cap companies are much
more rigorously aligned to performance.’

FDs at underperforming companies have been panned for their bonuses, but
Carter believes they would still be in a strong position in the long term
despite the changes.

‘I don’t think that we’re going to cry too much just yet that directors of
big-listed companies are going to starve.’

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource