PracticeAuditHigher auditing costs set to hit private companies hardest

Higher auditing costs set to hit private companies hardest

New standards designed to bring ‘clarity’ to international auditing standards ­ or ISAs ­ are set to cost companies more

Bringing clarity to standards: Paul Boyle

Bringing clarity to standards: Paul Boyle

Less is more, they say ­ and where international auditing standards are
concerned, the phrase has an extra irony.

New standards designed to bring ‘clarity’ to international auditing standards
­ or ISAs ­ are set to cost companies more. That, at least, is the view of the
head of the UK’s accounting regulator in the UK, the
Financial Reporting Council
chief executive Paul Boyle.

According to Boyle, the new ISAs have more detailed requirements than the
present standards.

‘As a result of that, the likelihood is that audit costs will go up to some
degree. At the top end of the market it may be bearable, but not at the private
end of the market.

‘The pressure to improve ISAs has come primarily from people interested in
the audit of listed companies, and listed companies typically have lots more
money,’ he said. ‘What’s acceptable to BP may not be acceptable to private
companies.’

The new standards, from the US-based
International Auditing and
Assurance Standards Board
, are meant to help implementation of the standards
with more consistency and so increase the quality of assurance.

The threat of more burdensome audit regulations will be tiresome for
companies still bedding down international financial reporting standards and
other regulations.

The difficulties for private companies will also raise questions over whether
audit standards should be the same for both private and public companies.

The chairman of the IAASB John Kellas has, understandably, taken issue with
Boyle’s comments.

Kellas said that any complaints over increased requirements raise questions
over how the current standards are being interpreted.

‘When one considers those who raise the issue of requirements pushing up
costs, the question that arises is how the standard was previously interpreted,’
said Kellas.

‘Auditors already interpret the standards with some guidance, but now we’re
making clear what we expect to be done, so as to also make practice more
consistent.’

He also sought to reassure the profession that the project would not be
subject to further revision.

But many seem sceptical of reviews like the IAASB’s in general.

John Pierce, chief executive of the Quoted Companies Alliance, said: ‘When
you get used to one set of regulations, another lot come along, doing something
different, rather than better.’

The ISAs are due to be finalised this year, with the date for implementation
falling to accounts for financial years beginning after 15 December.

To read more click here

Related Articles

PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

Audit PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

6d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

Audit The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

2w Carl Johnson, Stephensons
BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

Audit BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

Audit FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

4w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

Audit EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

Accounting Firms KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

Audit Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor