PracticeAuditTime to rethink bank audits, says accounting professor

Time to rethink bank audits, says accounting professor

Commons Treasury select committee member expresses concern that banks' financial instruments are too complex even for auditors to understand

RBS

Issues at RBS were not flagged up

Are the labyrinthine structures of high street banks, and their exotic
financial instruments, becoming too complicated for even the auditors to
understand?

This was one of the questions posed by the influential Commons Treasury
select committee which met last month.

The committee met to rake over the ashes of the banking crises – who is too
blame and what lessons can be learnt? It questioned representatives from
ACCA and the
ICAEW, two eminent
professors, as well as City regulator the
Financial Services Authority and auditors.

One MP, Jim Cousins, questioned whether auditors could be expected to keep
pace with the complexities of banking practices when so much lies off balance
sheet and offshore.

Other MPs highlighted a perceived breakdown in the relationship between
regulators, auditors and clients. Had that breakdown, one asked, led to a point
where unsustainable risks were taken unchecked by banks?

Deloitte had racked up some £31m in audit fees from its work on RBS, but
failed to either spot or flag up some of the more risky balance sheet items,
another MP said.

The inferences were clear: either the system is broken, the auditors were
incompetent, or, more worryingly, that one of the Big Four, with all the
resources at its disposal, was incapable of accurately auditing a major UK bank.

Answers were not forthcoming as the institutes and well-briefed Big Four
representatives stressed the limits of auditors’ responsibilities.

But Professor Michael Power of the LSE wondered whether the crisis was the
opportunity to fundamentally rethink audit’s role in the financial system, and
perhaps even ‘start again’.

Both the ICAEW and ACCA defended the profession from accusations of inaction,
but the committee continued to question whether auditors should have taken
action to work with regulators to improve banks’ risk management.

Power was more sympathetic towards the role of auditors, arguing that they
should not be expected to avert management disasters and question dubious
business models.

‘Auditors are not there to challenge business models with finance directors,’
he said. ‘For that to happen, things would have to change substantially.’

Mitigating circumstances aside, auditors can expect to face more tough
questioning and regulatory scrutiny over the next year as the fall out from the
banking crisis continues.

Related Articles

Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

Audit Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

5d Martin Herron, MHA MacIntyre Hudson
Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

Audit Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

1w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PCAOB sanctions former Deloitte Turkey CEOs over altered documents

Audit PCAOB sanctions former Deloitte Turkey CEOs over altered documents

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

Audit KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

Audit FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

Audit Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

Audit Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

Audit Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter