TaxCorporate TaxEmployers prepare for temporary worker tax hike

Employers prepare for temporary worker tax hike

NHS Trusts, the financial sector and charities are all preparing for a massive tax hike

The economy is heading for a downturn and unemployment is threatening to
climb. So why is the Treasury introducing a new tax hit that looks likely to
increase unemployment numbers?

That is the question some are asking, as one of the more perplexing decisions
of the 2008 Budget faces widespread criticism.

NHS trusts, the financial sector and charities are all preparing for a
massive tax hike after the government decided to raise the cost of employing
temporary staff.

The issue is about VAT on the costs of employing temps. Up to now agencies
benefited from a concession that meant they only charged VAT on the fees they
charged employers for the temps.

But from April 2009, they will pay VAT on the full salary of the temp as
well.

Sue White, of the Public Sector Tax Forum, says the difference might be
between paying VAT on £500 of a doctor’s salary and agency costs, rather than
solely on the £100 portion of that charged by the agency.

The NHS already pays £10m in VAT on agency staff. ‘I would expect [the extra
cost] to be more than that,’ says White.

Budget figures estimate a haul of £150m in 2009, and £125m in 2010.

So why is the government dropping the ‘staff hire concession’?

HMRC says the move was a temporary measure. In 1997 there was a discrepancy
in the tax treatment of different kinds of employment agents, and the concession
was introduced to create a level playing field. That has now been ironed out
through changes to separate pieces of law, and now all agents will pay the full
tax.

It also says it has to make the move to be consistent with EU law, and that
it will counteract some forms of tax avoidance.

But even so, it couldn’t really have come at a worse time.

‘The issue has been rumbling on for years, but this is a very bad time to be
doing it,’ says White.

The Recruitment and Employment Confederation have been even more damning.
Apart from the obvious costs, it adds: ‘The cost of agencies to change their
invoicing systems has been woefully miscalculated.’

White says the consultation was one where government appeared to ‘decide in
advance what it wanted to do.’

The NHS is now looking at costing the impact of the move. Might we, in due
course, see yet another policy u-turn from the calamitous Budget of 2008?

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson