The penalty HM Revenue and Customs applies to the next offshore tax amnesty
begs a question about how a penalty could encourage people to come forward to
declare untaxed income held offshore.
Last week it emerged the penalty is expected to triple from 10% of the tax
owed to 30%. Observers are sceptical that an increase will help the taxman.
So what is the right level? The department needs to strike a balance between
generating sufficient revenue and maintaining the compliance and co-operation
from taxpayers who came forward under the terms of the 2007 amnesty.
While tax advisers agree 30% is too high, if HMRC is to encourage people to
come forward, most also argue retaining a 10% penalty would be unfair to people
who disclosed information in the first amnesty.
Noshir Avari, of tax investigation consultants Avari, says a 30% penalty
would see too few taxpayers coming forward. ‘How could they expect people to
disclose with a 30% penalty when just £400m was collected through the first
amnesty. It’s not staggering,’ he says.
The second round of disclosures will see the net of targeted customers
broadened from the five major retail banks to as many as 500 other financial
Advisers are urging HMRC to roll out an advertising campaign publicising the
next round of disclosures, with many attributing the absence of a widespread
campaign to low revenue generated in the first amnesty.
Making Tax Digital will impose significant additional tax compliance costs on small businesses for little or no medium term benefit, tax and small business experts told MPs
The drive towards a fully digital tax regime is an admirable one, but mandation is simply wrong, according to one of the UK's most senior tax technology practitioners - Paul Aplin
HMRC has won its tenth successive case against tax avoidance schemes promoted by NT Advisors. The Court of Appeal has ruled that NT ... read more
HMRC is continuing to ramp up the number of raids on premises it carries out as part of criminal investigations, searching 761 properties in the last year