PracticeAuditInvestors pick new audit fight

Investors pick new audit fight

Investors claim that the profession once again tries to drastically limit its exposure to liability claims, over the issue of companies keeping proper books and accounting records

About six months ago, representatives from some of the largest UK investment
bodies were fighting tooth and nail to ensure that the true and fair view audit,
previously the cornerstone of UK auditing practice, did not disappear from
company law.

A hard fought campaign eventually saw the investors emerge victorious. Now a
new battlefront has emerged. Investors claim that the profession is once again
trying to drastically limit its exposure to liability claims, this time over the
issue of companies keeping proper books and accounting records.

Amendments to the company law reform bill proposed by opposition Treasury
spokeswoman Baroness Noakes last month would, the investors claim, significantly
reduce the auditors responsibility to check that a company keeps sufficiently
accurate day-to-day records on its activities. Ironically, it would mean that
the auditors’ duty was solely focused on judging the true and fair view of the
accounts.

The problem is, they argue, that the accounts of a company may give a true
and fair view on the financial position of a company, but the accounting records
and returns could still be in disarray.

Such problems with records have been the basis of many an accounting scandal
over the years, such as those at Parmalat and Barings, and the amendments would
distance auditors from any responsibility in such cases, it is feared.

It seems that the investors will not have to fight so furiously over this
one, however. While some of the amendments proposed by Baroness Noakes were
taken into consideration, government whip Lord McKenzie of Luton seems to have
the measure of the potential implications of the changes and has so far proved
quite resistant to them.

For her part, Baroness Noakes told Accountancy Age that the concerns of
investors had not been made known to her.

But that won’t stop investors from pressuring the government to ensure that
this matter doesn’t slip through the net. Concerns over the erosion of audit
quality are high, despite initiatives like the audit quality forum aimed at
improving the service provided to shareholders.

Further talks between the two parties may be necessary in order to resolve
any outstanding conflicts.

Related Articles

The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

Audit The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

5d Carl Johnson, Stephensons
BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

Audit BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

6d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

Audit FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

Audit EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

Accounting Firms KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

Audit Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

Accounting Firms FRC closes investigation into PwC over Barclays compliance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter