TaxCorporate TaxTaxman clears up PAYE confusion

Taxman clears up PAYE confusion

Employers who have not paid PAYE to HMRC because an employee has already paid the tax via self-assessment will not incur any additional liabilities after the publication of new legislation

HMRC building

The taxman has published the legislation following a special commissioners
case involving hotel company Demibourne, where it was found that the company
should have been responsible for an employee’s PAYE, but that the employee had
paid the income tax via self-assessment instead.

Special commissioner John Clark found that although the tax had been paid,
Demibourne was liable as it should have taken responsibility for the payment of
the tax through PAYE.

Clark said HMRC had no discretion to offset the tax paid by an employee
against the PAYE liability of the employer, and was obliged to collect tax from
the employer.

The case confirmed that where an employment relationship exists, the employer
is responsible for deducting tax from payments made to the employee in
accordance with the PAYE Regulations. HMRC did not have the discretion to choose
whether to collect tax from the employer or the employee.

HMRC has tried to deal with this anomaly by collecting the tax from the
company and then refunding the employee. It is then up to the employee to repay
the amount back to the business.

This has proved difficult to implement, as employers have found themselves
out of pocket with no easy way to recover the money from workers, especially
those who no longer work for a business. But with the new legislation it is
hoped that such difficulties will be erased.

Effectively the new rules will allow HMRC to transfer an employer’s PAYE
liability to an employee if it can be shown that the tax owed under PAYE has
been paid by via self-assessment.

The move has been welcomed by advisers, who believe the new law, which comes
into effect on 6 April this year, will make the process easier to manage.

‘The employer will no longer be liable for the PAYE that was due – removing
the circuitous and often unproductive sequence of tax charges, refunds and
offsets,’ a PricewaterhouseCoopers briefing note said.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson