TaxPersonal TaxHusband and wife defeat riles taxman

Husband and wife defeat riles taxman

HMRC is determined to stop couples exploiting the system, despite losing landmark case

The government intends to drive through the use of controversial tax rules to
prevent small businesses arranging their tax in the same way as Arctic Systems,
a spokesman for HM Revenue & Customs has said.

HMRC suffered a humiliating defeat recently in its drive to use settlements
legislation to impose higher taxes on the IT conultancy, but has said that it
will push through its view of the rules one way or another, including a possible
court challenge in the House of Lords.

The spokesman said that the government was ‘committed to creating a fair tax
system and a level playing field for all businesses’. But when asked if HMRC
would need to legislate or re-write tax legislation, he refused to comment.

On 15 December last year HMRC lost its long-running battle against Geoff and
Diana Jones, owners of small IT consultancy Arctic Systems. The case, a section
660A appeal, revolved around HMRC’s objection to the way the couple used their
salaries and dividend payments to reduce their joint tax bill.

Simon Juden, chairman of the Professional Contractor’s Group – the body that
has backed and funded the Jones’ in their case to the tune of tens of thousands
of pounds – said that HMRC would pay all costs incurred, thought to be well into
six figures. He added that the ‘appropriate’ way forward would be for the
government to legislate.

‘Now the case is won, husband and wife companies can continue to run their
businesses the way the government and the DTI advised them to in the first
place. Companies will now be able to share the rewards as well as the burdens.

‘If the government wants to change the law so that businesses are caught in
the settlements net then it will have to legislate in the House of Commons,’ he
said.

Kevin Nicholson, UK head of enterprise and private companies and clients at
PricewaterhouseCoopers, said HMRC had little choice over the matter. ‘Either
they accept the ruling or bring in new legislation, but I can’t see how they
will do this. They would have to come up with a new way of taxing husband and
wife businesses because fiddling with the existing law would be very
complicated. But it’s not obvious how they would do it.

‘The variations on who this would affect are numerous and very complicated.
What if a couple lives together and own businesses together, what if the couple
involved are single sex? Once you bring taxation into relationships things start
getting very complicated,’ said Nicholson.

Related Articles

HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

5m Emma Smith, Managing Editor