Foreign companies with UK subsidiaries can kiss goodbye to any hopes of
taking advantage of favourable European Court of Justice tax rulings following a
victory for HM Revenue & Customs in the House of Lords last week.
In a decision on the Boake Allen case, which saw the subsidiaries of non-EU
parent companies attempt to use EU non-discrimination rules to claim back tax,
the Lords ruled unanimously in favour of HMRC.
The companies leading the action were based in Japan, the US and Switzerland.
The claim arose because their UK subsidiaries paid dividends, which in effect
meant they paid corporation tax earlier than if they had had UK parents.
The non-EU companies argued that because they had taxation treaties with the
UK, they should be eligible for the same benefits afforded to those with EU
But the Lords ruled that the tax treaties were far more limited in their
scope than the EU treaty, which businesses with EU parents had used to win a
‘This case is likely to make it very much harder for foreign multinationals
to make claims based on EU tax cases,’ said Bill Dodwell, head of tax policy at
MTD represents 'the single most significant change to the UK’s system of taxation in recent times', says Knill James partner Nick Rawson. So, how prepared are SMEs for digital tax reporting?
The SME community voices concern about the chancellor's measures in the Spring Budget
Following chancellor Philip Hammond’s Spring Budget speech, we explore the key takeaways for businesses and individuals
Unincorporated businesses under the VAT threshold given an extra year to prepare before MTD becomes mandatory