TaxCorporate TaxVodafone shares sink under tax bill

Vodafone shares sink under tax bill

A victory by the taxman in the European courts would see Vodafone lose £1.2bn

Vodafone has revealed it is facing an enormous £5bn tax bill over the next
three years. The group dropped a place to fifth in the FTSE100, after it
revealed the extent of its tax issues and other downbeat prospects during its
interim results announcement last week.

Though the liabilities have been provided for on the balance sheet, they are
now imminently payable. The total includes £2bn as part of a group litigation
order brought by Vodafone in the European Court of Justice.

Vodafone is just one of the multinational companies bringing a GLO over the
enforceability of UK tax law within the European framework. But while other GLOs
challenge individual aspects of the rules, Vodafone’s claim goes further by
challenging HM Revenue & Customs’ right to even ask questions about foreign
subsidiaries, or controlled foreign companies (CFC) as they are known in UK tax
rules.

Vodafone’s argument is that, if a separate Cadbury Schweppes claim on CFC
succeeds and the CFC rules prove unenforceable, there is no need for it to
comply with HMRC’s request for information.

Court documents reveal that Vodafone will argue that ‘since the imposition of
UK tax contravened Articles 43 and 56EC, there could be no valid requirement to
produce documents or provide information in relation to any part of the enquiry
that relates to compliance with the CFC legislation’.

HMRC had asked for more information on its subsidiary Vodafone Investments
Luxembourg Sarl (VIL Sarl). Vodafone disposed of shares in Mannesman into VIL
Sarl, after it took over the former in the late nineties during one of the
largest M&A deals in corporate history.

Vodafone’s annual report and accounts disclosed earlier this year that the
case was worth £1.75bn.

CFC rules are designed to prevent companies channeling funds offshore to
avoid tax, and any successful challenge to HMRC’s ability to ask questions about
them would drive a hole in its anti-avoidance programme.

Related Articles

‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

1m Emma Rawson
R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

Corporate Tax R&D incentives: How businesses can reap the rewards of innovation

2m Sam Swansborough
Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Corporate Tax Q&A with the Financial Secretary to the Treasury

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Guide to the UK corporate tax system

Corporate Tax Guide to the UK corporate tax system

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

Corporate Tax OTS report: Corporation tax should follow accounts

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

Corporate Tax HMRC tax evasion assistance requests double in five years

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor