TaxCorporate TaxExperts dismiss tax on City bonuses

Experts dismiss tax on City bonuses

Suggestions that City bonuses could be taxed more heavily are 'counter productive', says Grant Thornton

city london

Any changes to tax structures in curbing the culture and volume of City
bonuses won’t be effective, according to leading tax experts.

In a testing political climate, with the unions calling for a tax crackdown
on the City, and bonuses selected as a particular target, there have been
suggestions that bonuses could be taxed more heavily.

Advisers don’t see it as practical, however. Mike Warburton, senior tax
partner at Grant
Thornton
, said historical evidence shows any changes in raising tax rates to
be counter productive. He argues the current 40% rate is the correct level in
maximising the level of income tax collected by the Treasury.

‘You can’t have something which says we’re going to have a special tax for
people who work in the City and earn over a certain amount… I’m not trying to
protect people who earn over £200,000 per year.

It would just be counter productive,’ Warburton said.

Chancellor Alistair Darling is under increasing pressure to implement a more
transparent regime in the recording of bonuses paid to City executives.

The Financial Services
Authority
is thought to be considering measures in stemming the issue,
including the possibility of banks being obliged to retain capital if excessive
risks were carried out in securing bonuses.

Warburton said bank behaviour ought to change. ‘It would be wrong to apply a
special tax rate for higher income levels because it’s been proved to be
ineffective. Banks needs to have some moderation,’ he said.
According to Chas Roy-Chowdhury, head of taxation at the
ACCA, irrespective of
whether there is a change to tax structure, there needs to be an improved audit
trail on bonuses paid, and a direct correlation between remuneration and how the
bonus has materialised.

‘There really isn’t a simple answer. Whether it’s a good or bad idea, I don’t
know. It’s difficult to see the profit trail of their work,’ he said.

Richard Murphy, advisor at the
Tax
Justice Network
, said that there are limited options from a tax perspective,
but that the Treasury could potentially increase the rate applied to employer’s
national insurance on salaries over a certain threshold, nominating £200,000 as
a prospective cutoff.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

2m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

2m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson