Is it time to revise your planning methods?
By Mark White, MHR Analytics
By Mark White, MHR Analytics
We recently flagged up the potential value of balanced scorecards (BSC), especially when it comes to measuring your progress towards strategic goals. But what about your broader planning capabilities? Here’s how updating your planning, budgeting and forecasting methods can help you meet some of today’s biggest operational and strategic challenges.
Currently, Nordic and Spanish ports are still grappling with the fallout from last month’s Suez Canal grounding. There are warnings that the emergence of new Covid-19 variants could jeopardise the UK’s return to normal. Meanwhile, in the run-up to the COP26 conference, governments are being urged to ramp up the pace and intensity of decarbonisation measures.
So how far might these three disparate events impact your business? Of course, they might all blow over without consequence. Or a ‘triple whammy’ could arrive: production lead times are suddenly in disarray, physical outlets are prevented from opening, and legislation is introduced that threatens your operating model.
Uncertainty, volatility, twists and turns are all now the norm. Against this backdrop, a rigid planning process becomes a business risk in itself. Decisions based on plans and budgets drawn up months previously can lead to expensive mistakes. If you attempt to hold your company to targets or budget limits based on out-of-date information, it becomes both frustrating to employees and counterproductive to performance.
To illustrate, here are some examples of how an injection of flexibility into your planning processes can be a real boost for business resilience.
The last 12 months has forced a doubling down on cost management to scrutinise expenses more closely than ever before. On the plus side, however, you may have discovered some valuable cost savings: eg by reducing your property portfolio or through the reduction in business travel.
The budgeting challenge is twofold. Most importantly, the budgeting process needs to be robust and accurate enough to ensure continued liquidity, while still ensuring funds are directed to the company’s strategic priorities. Secondly, you should aim to permanently capitalise on any tactical savings that have been identified.
What is a realistic revenue projection for this year? As the outlook improves, we may be entering ‘revenge buying’ territory, whereby pent-up demand is unleashed. In many sectors however, the size and strength of any bounce-back may be very difficult to predict.
On the supply side, the last year has highlighted how sudden events affecting a relatively minor sub-tier can critically impact an entire chain.
With multiple variables in play, static forecasts can be rendered inaccurate from day one. Of course, you will still need an annual operating plan for things like mandatory reporting and anchoring the compensation budget. But day to day, how do you respond to volatility linked to the likes of customer preferences, exchange rates, supply outages and fuel prices?
Last November, the Chancellor announced a roadmap for a new raft of climate-related financial disclosures. This includes details of board-level oversight of climate-related risks and opportunities. It also covers risk management: ie disclosure of how the company identifies, assesses and manages these risks, as well as disclosure of the metrics and targets used to assess them.
This is part of a wider trend, whereby regulators, customers, investors, suppliers and employees all expect organisations to define, measure and act on ESG goals. There’s a risk management perspective here, too. Forward-thinking organisations need to understand and monitor their own exposure to climate change risk, and adapt accordingly.
From customised reports through to scenario planning, MHR Analytics specialises in helping organisations put together the optimum planning toolkit from across a range of world-leading technologies. To bring your processes up to scratch, speak to us today.