Dispute over DST talks continues

Dispute over DST talks continues

Revenue-hungry national governments are being tempted to implement digital services taxes as a cross border agreement has stuttered

Dispute over DST talks continues

National governments are moving forward with their own digital services tax (DST) as patience wears thin on progress of rules at the OECD level.

“Every tax jurisdiction is going to be under pressure to collect more from all taxpayers, but probably foreign taxpayers are an easier target than local taxpayers,” says Laurence Field, partner at Crowe UK.

“What the current crisis will do is make some governments a little keener to go on a short term cash grab and then sort out the problems with the international tax system later rather than the traditional way of getting the system in place and then working out how best to implement it.”

In April, the UK implemented its own digital tax which requires a group’s business providing social media service, search engine or an online marketplace to pay two percent tax on its revenue.

The adoption of the new tax could well be beneficial for the UK government whose spending was estimated by the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) to be between £263.4bn and £391.2bn for the current financial year.

By response, tech giants are now passing the new costs onto their customers and advertisers.

Google said it will pass on the UK tax to advertisers from November in emails sent to advertisers and seen by CityAM. That followed a similar announcement by Amazon’s announcement last month.

Marcus Knight, co-founder of marketing agency Prospect Knight says the majority of the company’s clients are planning on reducing their spend by two percent as they cannot afford to pay the added tax.

Google said it will also pass on the DST charge to advertisers that run ads in Austria and Turkey, which accounts for five percent in those countries, according to CityAM.

“The interesting thing with Google advertising is that ads can appear in different countries if they are relevant to the user. People will need to be careful to exclude those countries if they don’t want to get taxed that higher amount,” says Knight.

Earlier this year, members of the OECD affirmed their commitment to tackling the tax challenges arising from the digitisation of the economy – but the US Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer said in June that the US was pulling out of negotiations as the tax mainly targeted American multinationals.

French finance minister Bruno Le Maire said it was the “last state blocking an agreement on digital taxation at the OECD” whilst speaking at the French Senate’s finance committee, reported Bloomberg.

Le Maire has since reiterated the urgency to implement a fair and efficient taxation system at an international level rather than local, during the Eurogroup meeting of eurozone finance ministers on Friday.

“You know how important it is for us to have a fair and efficient international taxation system as soon as possible. If you look at the consequences of the economic crisis, the only winners of the economic crisis are the digital giants. I think this is a new reason to accelerate the work we are doing within the OECD to have fair digital taxation and to also have the implementation of the minimum tax for the corporate tax,” he said.

However, Le Maire said during the meeting that the EU would need to prepare for a digital tax solution by the beginning of next year if the US decided to step out.

Failure to reach a global consensus could mean that jurisdictions adopt different digital tax rules – risking creating double taxation for those tech giants.

“The big problem is if countries do their own thing and that there is no coordination. Not only would it confuse the companies that are going to be affected by it, but it also throws up in the air how we’ve done cross-border trade and given relief for double tax for the last 50 years,” says Field.

“It doesn’t have to be an insurmountable problem, but it’s clearly one where the global economy has got a lot of challenges. They’re having more unknowns into the equation and now maybe isn’t the time for that to be the case.”

Field yet says the US election will bring further clarity on DST negotiations due next month.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource