The EU’s €9bn Brexit budget gap
In his monthly column, Avalara's Richard Asquith discusses how the EU could plug the €9bn post-Brexit gap in net contributions.
In his monthly column, Avalara's Richard Asquith discusses how the EU could plug the €9bn post-Brexit gap in net contributions.
As the UK prepares, again, to attempt an EU exit, the remaining 27 member states are struggling to fill the loss of €9bn in net contributions. The forfeiture of around 13% of the EU’s 2020 budget could not come at a worse time: recent 2019 Eurozone second quarter GDP figures slowed to 0.8% from 1.8% in the first quarter.
Larger member state contributions are unlikely. The small, contributory states (Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden), have adopted the austerity slogan ‘a smaller EU, smaller budget’. And reductions on spend in the Central European states or agriculture expenditure have powerful opponents, too.
The EU will therefore have to look to develop more of its ‘own resources’, Brussels-speak for the direct revenues raised by the EU Commission (EC). At present, in addition to member state contributions, the EC takes a small slither of member states’ VAT revenues, plus about 80% of import customs duties. To close the €9bn post-Brexit gap without spending cuts, there are a range of additional taxes the EU is exploring with little success so far:
The EU is covered on the contribution gap for 2019 since the UK is committed to paying its full 2019 dues even in the case of a no-deal Brexit. However, unless there is another postponement of Brexit, or a two-year transition period, then that is it. The 2020 EU budget should be agreed upon by September. So far, the member states have failed to agree on the right new tax mix.
The quandary on how to fill an UK-shaped budget hole remains unsolved with just a few months to go.