KPMG fined and reprimanded over Ted Baker audits

KPMG fined and reprimanded over Ted Baker audits

The offenders admitted breaching ethical standards and losing independence in the audits

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has imposed sanctions against KPMG and a senior statutory auditor over the audits of retailer Ted Baker.

The Big Four firm together with Michael Francis Barradell, senior statutory auditor and audit engagement partner, has been fined and reprimanded by the watchdog following admission of misconduct in the audits of Ted Baker’s financial statements.

The misconduct occurred during the financial years ending 26 January 2013 and 25 January 2014, and apply to Ted Baker plc and No Ordinary Designer Label Limited, which combined make up Ted Baker.

Settlement terms have been agreed by the FRC’s Executive Counsel. KPMG will receive a Severe Reprimand plus a fine of £3,000,000, which has actually been discounted due to the firm’s agreement to settle to £2,100,000.

The Big Four player will also have to pay £112,000 regarding the entirety of the Executive Counsel’s costs.

The offending Mr Barradell will also receive a reprimand of £80,000 which will be reduced to £46,800 due to mitigating factors plus a discount for choosing to settle.

The misconduct arose because KPMG provided expert witness services to Ted Baker in a Commercial Court claim.

This breached ethical standards and caused the loss of KPMG’s independence in the audits. There was a significant self-interest threat because the fees for the expert engagement exceeded the audit fees in the relevant years, which KPMG and Barradell failed to consider.

KPMG and Barradell both admitted their behaviour fell short of the standards expected of a member firm and member of the ICAEW. They failed to act as the body’s Fundamental Principle of Professional Competence and Due Care directs.

Claudia Mortimore, interim executive counsel at the FRC, said: “Ethical Standards are critical in supporting the confidence that third party users can reasonably have in financial statements in circumstances where, of necessity, they only have incomplete information to judge whether the auditor is in fact objective.

“Where those standards are breached such that the auditor’s independence is lost, user confidence is likely to be undermined; the FRC makes clear by these sanctions the seriousness with which such breaches and their consequences are viewed.”

Whitepaper

The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

Business The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

2m
Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

Accounting Software Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

3m
Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

Legal Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

4m
Could tax season have run more efficiently?

Corporate Tax Could tax season have run more efficiently?

4m

Related Articles

Financial reporting – a new era beckons for professionals, directors and their insurers

Audit Financial reporting – a new era beckons for professionals, directors and their insurers

6d Rebecca Smith, Partner
KPMG slapped with $50m fine over past audit work

Audit KPMG slapped with $50m fine over past audit work

1w Tom Lemmon
Audit of the future

Audit Audit of the future

2w Andy Turner, Audit and Business Advisory Partner
PwC audit changes are “unacceptable”

Audit PwC audit changes are “unacceptable”

3w Tom Lemmon
PwC reveals “big deal” tech plan to boost audit quality

Audit PwC reveals “big deal” tech plan to boost audit quality

3w Dave Beach
Grant Thornton to up audit quality with new appointment

Audit Grant Thornton to up audit quality with new appointment

3w Dave Beach
Audit sector needs a bold new regulator

Audit Audit sector needs a bold new regulator

1m Sam Walsh and Richard Khaldi, Regulation and transformation experts at PA Consulting
KPMG UK announce new audit structure – but is it enough?

Audit KPMG UK announce new audit structure – but is it enough?

1m Tom Lemmon