HMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

HMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

Ending a decade long legal battle, the Supreme Court has ruled HMRC does not have to pay Littlewoods £1.25bn in compound interest

The Supreme Court has ruled HMRC will not have to pay retail company Littlewoods £1.25bn in relation to VAT overpayments, in the final culmination of a legal battle that has spanned over a decade.

The Barclay brothers-owned company overpaid millions in VAT to HMRC over the period 1973 – 2004. The taxman repaid Littlewoods the £205m sum along with simple interest of £268m in the following years.

Littlewoods then took legal action seeking £1.25bn in compound interest from HMRC as restitution for the “mistake of law” or “unlawfully demanded tax”, which the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed.

The Court meanwhile allowed an HMRC appeal to an earlier ruling that said denying Littlewoods compound interest was in violation of EU law.

A spokesperson for HMRC said: “This is a great outcome for the UK taxpayer. The Supreme Court’s confirmation of HMRC’s understanding of EU and UK law on the payment of interest on VAT repayments will protect billions of pounds to fund the UK’s public services.”

This will be a precedent-setting case, as an adverse ruling for HMRC would have galvanised thousands of other companies to pursue similar claims. The Supreme Court judgement stated that 5,000 similar claims relating to VAT are stayed pending as a result of this ruling.

Andrew Hubbard, tax consultant at RSM commented that the judgement would be an immense relief to HMRC.

He added: “The latest HMRC accounts revealed there were 19 ongoing cases in which HMRC was potentially liable to make tax repayments exceeding £100m – with the total contingent liability reaching almost £19bn.”

A spokesperson for the Barclays brothers commented: “This is a disappointing outcome. Having succeeded in the high court, the European court of justice and the court of appeal in a long process lasting over a decade, we are surprised by the supreme court’s decision.”

However, the brothers confirmed that this ruling would “draw a line under this case.”

Whitepaper

The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

Business The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

3m
Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

Accounting Software Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

4m
Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

Legal Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

5m
Could tax season have run more efficiently?

Corporate Tax Could tax season have run more efficiently?

5m

Related Articles

The ‘genuinely self-employed’ need not fear IR35 changes

HMRC The ‘genuinely self-employed’ need not fear IR35 changes

1d Tom Lemmon
FRC announce HMRC CEO Jon Thompson as replacement for Haddrill

HMRC FRC announce HMRC CEO Jon Thompson as replacement for Haddrill

4d Tom Lemmon
IR35 - HMRC scrutinising where TV presenters stand and choice of clothes for tax purposes

HMRC IR35 - HMRC scrutinising where TV presenters stand and choice of clothes for tax purposes

7d Chris Jewers
Struggles faced by sole traders revealed by HMRC tax record study

Business Struggles faced by sole traders revealed by HMRC tax record study

2w Chris Jewers
HMRC collects £37bn from new taxes introduced during the last decade

HMRC HMRC collects £37bn from new taxes introduced during the last decade

2w Chris Jewers
Taxpayers frustrated as HMRC toughens late self-assessment stance

HMRC Taxpayers frustrated as HMRC toughens late self-assessment stance

3w Dave Beach
HMRC loses £13.2bn in tax to criminals 

HMRC HMRC loses £13.2bn in tax to criminals 

1m Dave Beach
Phone security expert lauds HMRC’s response to scam surge

HMRC Phone security expert lauds HMRC’s response to scam surge

2m Dave Beach