HMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

HMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

Ending a decade long legal battle, the Supreme Court has ruled HMRC does not have to pay Littlewoods £1.25bn in compound interest

The Supreme Court has ruled HMRC will not have to pay retail company Littlewoods £1.25bn in relation to VAT overpayments, in the final culmination of a legal battle that has spanned over a decade.

The Barclay brothers-owned company overpaid millions in VAT to HMRC over the period 1973 – 2004. The taxman repaid Littlewoods the £205m sum along with simple interest of £268m in the following years.

Littlewoods then took legal action seeking £1.25bn in compound interest from HMRC as restitution for the “mistake of law” or “unlawfully demanded tax”, which the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed.

The Court meanwhile allowed an HMRC appeal to an earlier ruling that said denying Littlewoods compound interest was in violation of EU law.

A spokesperson for HMRC said: “This is a great outcome for the UK taxpayer. The Supreme Court’s confirmation of HMRC’s understanding of EU and UK law on the payment of interest on VAT repayments will protect billions of pounds to fund the UK’s public services.”

This will be a precedent-setting case, as an adverse ruling for HMRC would have galvanised thousands of other companies to pursue similar claims. The Supreme Court judgement stated that 5,000 similar claims relating to VAT are stayed pending as a result of this ruling.

Andrew Hubbard, tax consultant at RSM commented that the judgement would be an immense relief to HMRC.

He added: “The latest HMRC accounts revealed there were 19 ongoing cases in which HMRC was potentially liable to make tax repayments exceeding £100m – with the total contingent liability reaching almost £19bn.”

A spokesperson for the Barclays brothers commented: “This is a disappointing outcome. Having succeeded in the high court, the European court of justice and the court of appeal in a long process lasting over a decade, we are surprised by the supreme court’s decision.”

However, the brothers confirmed that this ruling would “draw a line under this case.”

Whitepaper

The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

Business The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

6m
Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

Accounting Software Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

7m
Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

Legal Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

7m
Could tax season have run more efficiently?

Corporate Tax Could tax season have run more efficiently?

8m

Related Articles

HMRC fraud investigations to have netted more than £610m since 2016

HMRC HMRC fraud investigations to have netted more than £610m since 2016

2d Leanna Reeves
Chancellor Sajid Javid opens talk on inheritance tax

HMRC Chancellor Sajid Javid opens talk on inheritance tax

2w Leanna Reeves
ATT calls for clarity on off-payroll changes

HMRC ATT calls for clarity on off-payroll changes

2w Leanna Reeves
HMRC wins IR35 case against three BBC presenters - Reaction

HMRC HMRC wins IR35 case against three BBC presenters - Reaction

3w Chris Jewers
For charities, MTD regulation deadline is just around the corner

HMRC For charities, MTD regulation deadline is just around the corner

3w Leanna Reeves
Loan charge to remain in force while new review is underway

HMRC Loan charge to remain in force while new review is underway

1m Leanna Reeves
HMRC postpones domestic reverse charge for construction services

HMRC HMRC postpones domestic reverse charge for construction services

1m Leanna Reeves
Self-employed owed HMRC £1.6bn in late tax payments

HMRC Self-employed owed HMRC £1.6bn in late tax payments

1m Leanna Reeves