Brexit & EconomyHMRCHMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

HMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

Ending a decade long legal battle, the Supreme Court has ruled HMRC does not have to pay Littlewoods £1.25bn in compound interest

The Supreme Court has ruled HMRC will not have to pay retail company Littlewoods £1.25bn in relation to VAT overpayments, in the final culmination of a legal battle that has spanned over a decade.

The Barclay brothers-owned company overpaid millions in VAT to HMRC over the period 1973 – 2004. The taxman repaid Littlewoods the £205m sum along with simple interest of £268m in the following years.

Littlewoods then took legal action seeking £1.25bn in compound interest from HMRC as restitution for the “mistake of law” or “unlawfully demanded tax”, which the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed.

The Court meanwhile allowed an HMRC appeal to an earlier ruling that said denying Littlewoods compound interest was in violation of EU law.

A spokesperson for HMRC said: “This is a great outcome for the UK taxpayer. The Supreme Court’s confirmation of HMRC’s understanding of EU and UK law on the payment of interest on VAT repayments will protect billions of pounds to fund the UK’s public services.”

This will be a precedent-setting case, as an adverse ruling for HMRC would have galvanised thousands of other companies to pursue similar claims. The Supreme Court judgement stated that 5,000 similar claims relating to VAT are stayed pending as a result of this ruling.

Andrew Hubbard, tax consultant at RSM commented that the judgement would be an immense relief to HMRC.

He added: “The latest HMRC accounts revealed there were 19 ongoing cases in which HMRC was potentially liable to make tax repayments exceeding £100m – with the total contingent liability reaching almost £19bn.”

A spokesperson for the Barclays brothers commented: “This is a disappointing outcome. Having succeeded in the high court, the European court of justice and the court of appeal in a long process lasting over a decade, we are surprised by the supreme court’s decision.”

However, the brothers confirmed that this ruling would “draw a line under this case.”

Related Articles

Is HMRC’s increased VAT take unfairly impacting small businesses?

HMRC Is HMRC’s increased VAT take unfairly impacting small businesses?

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Mel Stride, Financial Secretary to the Treasury

Brexit Mel Stride, Financial Secretary to the Treasury

3w Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
Financial Power List 2018: 1-5 revealed

Accounting Firms Financial Power List 2018: 1-5 revealed

3w Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

Corporate Tax HMRC large business tax enquiry duration rises to 3 years

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PAC: HMRC transformation plan has ‘potentially catastrophic consequences’

HMRC PAC: HMRC transformation plan has ‘potentially catastrophic consequences’

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC forces Apple to pay £137m in back taxes

HMRC HMRC forces Apple to pay £137m in back taxes

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Top 5 HMRC disputes of 2017

HMRC Top 5 HMRC disputes of 2017

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
How to avoid HMRC scam emails and phone calls

HMRC How to avoid HMRC scam emails and phone calls

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor