HMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

HMRC victorious in £1.25bn VAT dispute with Littlewoods

Ending a decade long legal battle, the Supreme Court has ruled HMRC does not have to pay Littlewoods £1.25bn in compound interest

The Supreme Court has ruled HMRC will not have to pay retail company Littlewoods £1.25bn in relation to VAT overpayments, in the final culmination of a legal battle that has spanned over a decade.

The Barclay brothers-owned company overpaid millions in VAT to HMRC over the period 1973 – 2004. The taxman repaid Littlewoods the £205m sum along with simple interest of £268m in the following years.

Littlewoods then took legal action seeking £1.25bn in compound interest from HMRC as restitution for the “mistake of law” or “unlawfully demanded tax”, which the Supreme Court has unanimously dismissed.

The Court meanwhile allowed an HMRC appeal to an earlier ruling that said denying Littlewoods compound interest was in violation of EU law.

A spokesperson for HMRC said: “This is a great outcome for the UK taxpayer. The Supreme Court’s confirmation of HMRC’s understanding of EU and UK law on the payment of interest on VAT repayments will protect billions of pounds to fund the UK’s public services.”

This will be a precedent-setting case, as an adverse ruling for HMRC would have galvanised thousands of other companies to pursue similar claims. The Supreme Court judgement stated that 5,000 similar claims relating to VAT are stayed pending as a result of this ruling.

Andrew Hubbard, tax consultant at RSM commented that the judgement would be an immense relief to HMRC.

He added: “The latest HMRC accounts revealed there were 19 ongoing cases in which HMRC was potentially liable to make tax repayments exceeding £100m – with the total contingent liability reaching almost £19bn.”

A spokesperson for the Barclays brothers commented: “This is a disappointing outcome. Having succeeded in the high court, the European court of justice and the court of appeal in a long process lasting over a decade, we are surprised by the supreme court’s decision.”

However, the brothers confirmed that this ruling would “draw a line under this case.”

Whitepaper

The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

Business The Future of Finance is in the CFO's Hands

1w
Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

Accounting Software Save a Week a Month Consolidating Accounts

1m
Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

Legal Mitigating Risk Through Internal Control

2m
Could tax season have run more efficiently?

Corporate Tax Could tax season have run more efficiently?

2m

Related Articles

HMRC applied to shut down 4,160 businesses in 2018

HMRC HMRC applied to shut down 4,160 businesses in 2018

2w Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
Are HMRC’s Accelerated Payment Notices proof of the taxman’s aggression?

HMRC Are HMRC’s Accelerated Payment Notices proof of the taxman’s aggression?

2w Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
HMRC retrospective loan charge causing problems for contractors

HMRC HMRC retrospective loan charge causing problems for contractors

2w Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
Friction between HMRC and the taxpayer as the number of tribunal disputes continues to rise

HMRC Friction between HMRC and the taxpayer as the number of tribunal disputes continues to rise

2w Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
Property taxation is under increasing scrutiny

HMRC Property taxation is under increasing scrutiny

1m Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
HMRC putting increasing pressure on accountants and lawyers

HMRC HMRC putting increasing pressure on accountants and lawyers

1m Emanuela Hawker, Reporter
HMRC's Profit Diversion Compliance Facility: what do businesses need to know?

HMRC HMRC's Profit Diversion Compliance Facility: what do businesses need to know?

1m Pinsent Masons, Jason Collins and Catherine Robins (partners)
IR35 for the private sector concerning for UK contractors

HMRC IR35 for the private sector concerning for UK contractors

2m Emanuela Hawker, Reporter